2021
DOI: 10.1017/s1551929520001777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges Facing an EM Core Laboratory: Mitochondria Structural Preservation and 3DEM Data Presentation

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[77] This results in a reduction in artifacts compared with traditional EM using chemical fixation. [78] However, high-pressure freezing and freeze substitution remain resource-intensive, [79] making techniques to minimize artifacts in chemical fixation, the most commonly utilized fixation method, still relevant. [80] Along with the development of the optimized fixation protocol, we described multiple methods to assess mitochondrial morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[77] This results in a reduction in artifacts compared with traditional EM using chemical fixation. [78] However, high-pressure freezing and freeze substitution remain resource-intensive, [79] making techniques to minimize artifacts in chemical fixation, the most commonly utilized fixation method, still relevant. [80] Along with the development of the optimized fixation protocol, we described multiple methods to assess mitochondrial morphology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transmission electron microscopy FACS-sorted naive CD4 + T cells from LNs and spleen were pelleted at 400g for 4 minutes by swinging bucket Eppendorf 5810 into BEEM conical capsule tips (69913-05, Electron Microscopy Sciences), and fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (CB; pH 7.2) overnight at 4°C. The sample was processed following the reduced osmium-thiocarbohydrazide-osmium (rOTO) method (69,70). Briefly, after washing with 0.1 M CB three times for 5 minutes each, the cells were postfixed with 2% osmium tetroxide and 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide in 0.1 M CB for 1.5 hours on ice.…”
Section: Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FACS-sorted naïve CD4+ T cells from LNs and spleen were pelleted at 400 g for 4 mins by swinging bucket Eppendorf 5810 into BEEM conical capsule tips (EMS, #69913-05), and fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1M sodium cacodylate buffer (CB, pH 7.2) overnight at 4°C. The sample was processed following rOTO method (69,70). In brief, after washing with 0.1M CB three times for 5 min each, the cells were post-fixed with 2% osmium tetroxide and 1.5% potassium ferrocyanide in 0.1M CB for 1.5 hours on ice.…”
Section: Transmission Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%