2018
DOI: 10.2478/johh-2018-0028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD simulation of flow behind overflooded obstacle

Abstract: This paper deals with studying of two topics – measuring of velocity profile deformation behind a over-flooded construction and modelling of this velocity profile deformation by computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Numerical simulations with an unsteady RANS models - Standard k-ε, Realizable k-ε, Standard k-ω and Reynolds stress models (ANSYS Fluent v.18) and experimental measurements in a laboratory flume (using ADV) were performed. Results of both approaches showed and affirmed presence of velocity profile de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another way of doing this is to control the flow at the intake windows with the sluice gates of the higher-placed intake window. Based on the results of the numerical model and published hydraulic research on the issue of the distribution of vertical velocity (Velísková et al, 2018;Kašpar et al, 2021;Bytčanková et al, 2021), the course of vertical velocities in the intake opening is stated in Fig. 5 and Tab.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another way of doing this is to control the flow at the intake windows with the sluice gates of the higher-placed intake window. Based on the results of the numerical model and published hydraulic research on the issue of the distribution of vertical velocity (Velísková et al, 2018;Kašpar et al, 2021;Bytčanková et al, 2021), the course of vertical velocities in the intake opening is stated in Fig. 5 and Tab.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RANS models are used extensively for the study of various components in hydroelectric plants [37]. Among that, the model is robust, requires less computational resources, and has reasonable precision for a wide range of turbulent flows [38]. • Boundary conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%