2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2010.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD modeling of pollution dispersion in a street canyon: Comparison between LES and RANS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
92
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
92
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that no consensus exists in the literature on any particular value, considering the various values that can be found, e.g. 0.5 in [54], 0.6 in [55], 0.72 in [56] or 0.9 in [57].…”
Section: Mass Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that no consensus exists in the literature on any particular value, considering the various values that can be found, e.g. 0.5 in [54], 0.6 in [55], 0.72 in [56] or 0.9 in [57].…”
Section: Mass Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LES is used instead of the Reynoldsaveraged Navier-Stokes turbulence models because of its accuracy (Tominaga and Stathopoulos, 2011). The resolvedscale Navier-Stokes equations are…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, LES technique is very computationally demanding (Walton and Cheng, 2002). In addition, even though the LES technique is able to provide information about instantaneous fluctuations of concentration field, which cannot be obtained by RANS computations, more detailed investigations are required for its application in street canyons (Tominaga and Stathopoulos, 2011). In this paper, the RANS approach and the one equation Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model (Spalart and Allmaras, 1992) are employed.…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Of Ufps Distribution Inside Street Canyonsmentioning
confidence: 99%