2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD boundary conditions for contaminant dispersion, heat transfer and airflow simulations around human occupants in indoor environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grid density and construction has been shown to influence flow results heavily [32,35,37,38] therefore a mesh independence study was first undertaken for the empty room scenario.…”
Section: Grid Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grid density and construction has been shown to influence flow results heavily [32,35,37,38] therefore a mesh independence study was first undertaken for the empty room scenario.…”
Section: Grid Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat flux generated by people was taken as 60 W/m 2 for the seated person [25]. The convective and radiative heat fluxes from the people were set to 18 W/m 2 and 42 W/m 2 respectively (recommended convection to radiation ratio of 30:70 [36]). The laptops generated 131 W of electrical power each (it was assumed that all generated electrical power was transformed into heat).…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heat flux generated by people was taken as 60 W/m 2 for the seated person [25]. It was assumed the heat from the people was transferred through convection (PerHeat) and radiation (PerRad) with a C:R ratio of 30:70 [36]. The ranges of the convective and radiative heat fluxes were specified as the average values ± 20%.…”
Section: Parametric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a large number of studies dealing with indoor environment with the use of CFD available from literature, see e.g. Srebric et al (2008), Chen and Wen (2010) and Liu et al (2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%