2014
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/555/1/012104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD aerodynamic analysis of non-conventional airfoil sections for very large rotor blades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter are obtained from the MaPFlow code of the Lab. of Aerodynamics, NTUA [22] and the GPU-enabled PUMA code (incompressible flow solver) of the Parallel CFD & Optimization Unit, NTUA [12]. All CFD results are in very good agreement.…”
Section: Flow Solver Verificationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The latter are obtained from the MaPFlow code of the Lab. of Aerodynamics, NTUA [22] and the GPU-enabled PUMA code (incompressible flow solver) of the Parallel CFD & Optimization Unit, NTUA [12]. All CFD results are in very good agreement.…”
Section: Flow Solver Verificationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Given that the study is focused on the estimation of integral quantities such as forces, rather than on the detailed description of the flow properties in terms of local distributions, simulations were performed using the default turbulence settings of the numerical code, avoiding the calibration of the model coefficients (www.openfoam.org). Different turbulence models are adopted in literature for the study of air flows past bluff bodies (Eriksson, 2007;Mansoorzadeh and Javanmard, 2014;Papadakis et al, 2014) and for simulating free-surface flows around structures (Losada et al, 2005;Prasad et al, 2015) or flood waves (Ozmen-Cagatay et al, 2014). Moreover, the lack of detailed experimental data does not allow an ad hoc calibration of the coefficients.…”
Section: Model Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of different flow solvers were used: RFOIL/XFOIL [12,13], the in-house viscous/inviscid method Q3UIC [14] the compressible CFD solvers WMB [15,16] and MapFlow by NTUA [21] and the incompressible CFD solver EllipSys2D [19,20]. For the transitional computations the transition modeling was based on the e N model [19,20].…”
Section: B Modelling Of 2d Airfoil Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Parts B and C of the test matrix, operational conditions of the AVATAR and INNWIND RWTs have been used. [21,22] applies the Bay model [23] with the Spalart Almaras (SA) turbulence model. The presence of the VGs is sensed through body forces that enter as source terms in the equations.…”
Section: B Cfd and Experimental Database Of Flow Devices On 2d Airfomentioning
confidence: 99%