2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10959-006-0038-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cesàro α-Integrability and Laws of Large Numbers-II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, if sup n≥1 E|X n | r < ∞ for some r > 0, then there exists a random variable X with E|X| p < ∞ for all 0 < p < r such that P (|X n | > t) ≤ P (|X| > t), t ≥ 0, n ≥ 1 (The proviso that r > 1 in Lemma 3 of Wei and Taylor [27] is not needed as was pointed out by Adler, Rosalsky, and Taylor [1]). So that Theorem 2.1 reduces to Corollary 4 of Chandra and Goswami [3] when the {X n , n ≥ 1} are pairwise independent and sup n≥1 E|X n | r < ∞ for some r > 1.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 21 Setmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, if sup n≥1 E|X n | r < ∞ for some r > 0, then there exists a random variable X with E|X| p < ∞ for all 0 < p < r such that P (|X n | > t) ≤ P (|X| > t), t ≥ 0, n ≥ 1 (The proviso that r > 1 in Lemma 3 of Wei and Taylor [27] is not needed as was pointed out by Adler, Rosalsky, and Taylor [1]). So that Theorem 2.1 reduces to Corollary 4 of Chandra and Goswami [3] when the {X n , n ≥ 1} are pairwise independent and sup n≥1 E|X n | r < ∞ for some r > 1.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 21 Setmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Chandra and Goswami [3], Bose and Chandra [2] considered this problem under uniformly integrable condition. Hong and Hwang [12], and Czerebak-Mrozowicz, Klesov and Rychlik [6] extended the result of Choi and Sung to the multidimensional case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extension to the case s > 1 is trivial. To prove this theorem, we first introduce a definition of strongly residually Cesàro α-integrable and a lemma of strong law of large numbers (Chandra and Goswami, 2005). …”
Section: Theorem 22 Assume the Condition (11) And The Drift Conditiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists a vast literature on weakening the independence assumptions there. For references see, e.g., [27], [6], [28], compare also Remark 2.1 which concerns the case α = 2 in Theorem 2.1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus by introducing the logarithmic factor in the mentioned conditions, one can avoid the additional conditions X n ≥ k < ∞ or sup EX n < ∞ in[6],[7, Theorem 1], and in[28, Remark 7]. The a.s. convergence assertion can be interpreted as an assertion on weighted means of…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%