1999
DOI: 10.1097/00006250-199909000-00024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical Length at 23 Weeks in Twins in Predicting Spontaneous Preterm Delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
49
2
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
49
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…We could observe an increase in risk for preterm delivery before 34 weeks to 50% using 25 mm as cut-off in our population. For the same cut-off, Souka et al described that of 45% delivered before 32 weeks of gestation (Souka et al, 1999). Yang et al examined 65 twin pregnancies using translabial or transvaginal ultrasonography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could observe an increase in risk for preterm delivery before 34 weeks to 50% using 25 mm as cut-off in our population. For the same cut-off, Souka et al described that of 45% delivered before 32 weeks of gestation (Souka et al, 1999). Yang et al examined 65 twin pregnancies using translabial or transvaginal ultrasonography.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of prospective studies [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] have shown the predictive value of midtrimester cervical length measurement in twin pregnancies; these data were collected in two large meta-analyses. The first meta-analysis included 21 studies, 16 in asymptomatic women and only 5 in symptomatic women; the collected data included 3,523 women.…”
Section: Prediction Of Preterm Birthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En un estudio realizado en los Estados Unidos se observó que el 57,4% de los niños producto de embarazos gemelares nació antes de las 37 semanas versus el 10,4% de las gestaciones únicas (15). Predicción de riesgo: Existe buena evidencia avalando que la detección del acortamiento cervical por examen digital o por medición ultrasonográfi-ca, es un buen predictor del riesgo de parto prematuro (16,17,18). Existe también buena evidencia de que la presencia cervicovaginal de fibronectina fetal (FF) predice un mayor riesgo de parto prematuro (19,20,21), sin embargo, no existen estudios intervencionales bien diseñados para indicar la incorporación del tamizaje rutinario de FF al manejo prenatal de embarazos gemelares.…”
Section: Parto Prematurounclassified