2019
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical Cancer Screening Access, Outcomes, and Prevalence of Dysplasia in Correctional Facilities: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Criminal-legal involved women are less likely to obtain preventive cervical care, and the current study provides insight into patient characteristics and provider practices that may facilitate follow-up among community-based women with abnormal Pap results. Overall, 69% of the women in the cohort obtained follow-up after an abnormal Pap result, which is similar to other reports of criminal-legal involved women, but much lower than the 90% follow-up rate observed in the general U.S. population [7][8][9][10]. Those criminallegal involved women with older age and a primary care provider were more likely to obtain follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Criminal-legal involved women are less likely to obtain preventive cervical care, and the current study provides insight into patient characteristics and provider practices that may facilitate follow-up among community-based women with abnormal Pap results. Overall, 69% of the women in the cohort obtained follow-up after an abnormal Pap result, which is similar to other reports of criminal-legal involved women, but much lower than the 90% follow-up rate observed in the general U.S. population [7][8][9][10]. Those criminallegal involved women with older age and a primary care provider were more likely to obtain follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Surveys of incarcerated women in the U.S. report that 67-84% of criminal-legal involved women have completed Pap testing within three years, which is comparable to the Pap testing rates cited for all women [4][5][6]. However, after receiving an abnormal Pap result, only 21-66% of criminal-legal involved women obtain the recommended follow-up-which is much lower than the 90% follow-up rate observed among women in the general population [7][8][9][10]. While criminal-legal involved women may have access to Pap testing, they have higher rates of cervical dysplasia, and are less likely to receive the necessary surveillance and treatments that can prevent the progression to cervical cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…O tratamento e a conformidade com as recomendações de acompanhamento são extremamente pobres. 28 Esses achados reforçam a necessidade de intervenções dentro dos sistemas prisionais, com estratégias efetivas em relação às medidas de triagem primária, detecção precoce e tratamento adequado para a neoplasia cervical uterina. [23][24][25] Evidencia-se que essas mulheres possuem comportamentos de riscos, como tabagismo, relações sexuais precoces, uso raro de preservativos, baixa escolaridade e a multiplicidade de parceiro(a)s. 4 Nessa investigação, encontrou-se um achado preocupante, uma vez que não foi relatada pelas participantes a realização de atividades educativas voltadas para prevenção de IST, CCU e oferta de informações a respeito dos tipos de neoplasias que acometem a população feminina durante a permanência dessas no período de reclusão nessa unidade prisional.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Detection of the so-called cervical cancer precursors -high-grade lesions CIN (2-3)/HGSIL and preventing their progression to invasive cancer through screening, behaviour signalling, follow-up, and possible treatment. Screening methods (screening programs) for secondary prevention have been developed [20,21]. There are two types of cervical screening: organized (population-wide), which targets certain groups (by age and frequency/interval of studies), and opportunistic, which is not comprehensive and does not meet the criteria for a screening program.…”
Section: Secondary Prevention Of Cervical Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%