2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral oxygenation changes in the prefrontal cortex: Effects of age and gender

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
76
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
10
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Age and sex were used as covariates given the group differences (see Table 16), which, although non-significant, may influence fNIRS signal. 151,152 The effect of ECT and drug were analysed in patients alone using a repeated measures ANOVA with one between-group factor [drug (saline vs. ketamine)] and three within-group factors [ECT (baseline vs. mid-ECT), region and time]. The Huynh-Feldt correction was applied to correct for sphericity violation, and post hoc exploration of individual regions was carried out by repeated measures ANOVA or ANCOVA by region.…”
Section: Near-infrared Spectroscopy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age and sex were used as covariates given the group differences (see Table 16), which, although non-significant, may influence fNIRS signal. 151,152 The effect of ECT and drug were analysed in patients alone using a repeated measures ANOVA with one between-group factor [drug (saline vs. ketamine)] and three within-group factors [ECT (baseline vs. mid-ECT), region and time]. The Huynh-Feldt correction was applied to correct for sphericity violation, and post hoc exploration of individual regions was carried out by repeated measures ANOVA or ANCOVA by region.…”
Section: Near-infrared Spectroscopy Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond this shortcoming fNIRS combines a number of features extremely attractive for language research. Being compatible with a natural environment and silent, the method's advantage has been proven in a number of previous studies in language research even in earliest infanthood (Fallgatter et al, 1998;Herrmann et al, 2006;Homae et al, 2006;Horovitz and Gore, 2004;Noguchi et al, 2002;Pena et al, 2003;Taga et al, 2003;Wartenburger et al, 2007, Watanabe et al, 1998. Here we challenge the methodology's potential to explore its versatility and reliability to differentiate activation in the three target areas discussed above (SFG/IPG/IFG).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These differences in activation during word generation w.r.t. jaw movement and rest and forward audio w.r.t reverse audio and rest concur with past research on fMRI (Gitelman et al 2005;Papathanassiou et al 2000;Wilke et al 2009;Wonga et al 2011;Yetkin et al 1995) and NIRS towards language studies (Bortfeld et al 2009;Herrmann et al 2003;Herrmann et al 2006;Kubota et al 2005;Kuwabara et al 2006;Quaresima et al 2002;Sato et al 1999). In addition, the lateralization studies ( Figure 5.10 and Figure 5.15) demonstrate that there is not only differences in activation in the fronto-temporal regions in response to word generation and word reception stimulus, but also the fact that the AL region is dominant during word generation and PL region is dominant during Word reception.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the area of understanding language in the brain, several researchers have applied NIRS to investigate either activation (Kuwabara et al 2006;Sato et al 1999;Quaresima et al 2002;Herrmann et al 2003;Kubota et al 2005;Kuwabara et al 2006;Herrmann et al 2006;Bortfeld et al 2009), functional connectivity (Schecklmann et al 2008) and/or lateralization (Watanabe et al 1998;Kennan et al 2002;Noguchi et al 2002;Watson et al 2004;Gallagher et al 2008) (in isolation). However, the effective connectivity analysis of language regions using NIRS has not been attempted to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%