2004
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2002.001834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebral motor control in patients with gliomas around the central sulcus studied with spatially filtered magnetoencephalography

Abstract: Objective: Application of spatially filtered magnetoencephalography (MEG) to investigate changes in the mechanism of cerebral motor control in patients with tumours around the central sulcus. Methods: MEG records were made during a repetitive hand grasping task in six patients with gliomas around the central sulcus and in four control subjects. Power decreases in the a (8-13 Hz), b (13-30 Hz), and low c bands (30-50 Hz) during the motor tasks (event related desynchronisation, ERD) were analysed statistically w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(10 reference statements)
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12,17 It has been proposed recently that this activity has a hyperactive component attributable, in some cases, to interhemispheric disinhibition. 18,19 Our results that show characteristic ipsilateral distribution of ␤ERD during grasping with the contralesional hand, a significantly increased activity in the ipsilateral hemisphere without a decrease on the side of the vascular lesion, and a "normal" behavior in the tapping task indicate that hyperactivity on the ipsilateral hemisphere seen in patients with vascular lesions but without motor impairment is not compensatory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…12,17 It has been proposed recently that this activity has a hyperactive component attributable, in some cases, to interhemispheric disinhibition. 18,19 Our results that show characteristic ipsilateral distribution of ␤ERD during grasping with the contralesional hand, a significantly increased activity in the ipsilateral hemisphere without a decrease on the side of the vascular lesion, and a "normal" behavior in the tapping task indicate that hyperactivity on the ipsilateral hemisphere seen in patients with vascular lesions but without motor impairment is not compensatory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 The working hand was supinated while the resting hand was pronated and placed on an arm rest. The data for each trial were collected relative to the trigger (sound cue or time "0") for 20 seconds and consisted of 2 periods: the "control" state in the time window Ϫ10 to 0 seconds, in which the patient remained still, and the "active" state in the time window 0 to ϩ10 seconds, which involved grasp and release movements ( Figure 1A).…”
Section: Meg Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18,23 Recently, spatially filtered MEG was performed to explore functional activation of areas important in motor control around the central sulcus. 27 In that study, MEG data were analyzed using synthetic aperture magnetometry to determine power changes in various frequency bands (event-related desynchronization). Beta event-related desynchronization was shown to localize to the contralateral sensorimotor cortex in control volunteers, whereas activation localized to the ipsilateral hemisphere of the affected hand in patients with tumors, suggesting that this paradigm may be useful in identifying not only regions of residually active cortex in the contralateral hemisphere, but also compensatory regions recruited in the ipsilateral hemisphere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous MEG-based studies of preoperative localization, investigators have used similar magnetometers with sensor arrays containing from 37 to 204 channels. 1,[3][4][5][6]19,22,24,25,27 Newer models such as whole-head MEG systems combined with advanced analysis methods provide a higher spatial sampling density, which may improve the accuracy of source localization beyond dipole fitting. Nonetheless, the motor cortex in the present study was adequately covered with a high density of sensors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%