“…This standard clinical definition misclassifies 25–30% of patients, and can be improved by the addition of retinal examination to identify features specific for histologically defined cerebral malaria (HCM) (Karney and Tong, 1972; Lewallen et al, 1993, 1999, 2000; Beare et al, 2004, 2006; Taylor et al, 2004). The pathogenesis of cerebral malaria remains controversial, and the precise pathway from illness to death difficult to discern; evidence exists to suggest a variety of plausible pathways and a number of individual factors which could impinge upon those pathways (Toro and Roman, 1978; Looareesuwa et al, 1983; Gopinathan et al, 1986; Clark et al, 1987, 2003a,b; Oo et al, 1987; Aikawa, 1988; Pongponratn et al, 1991; Aikawa et al, 1992; Nagatake et al, 1992; Molyneux et al, 1993; Patnaik et al, 1994; Turner et al, 1994; Nakazawa et al, 1995; Lucas et al, 1997; Richards, 1997; Newton et al, 1998; Lou et al, 2001; Piguet et al, 2002; Clark and Cowden, 2003; Liechti et al, 2003; Lopansri et al, 2003; Pino et al, 2003, 2005; Dzeing-Ella et al, 2005; Maguire et al, 2005; Viebig et al, 2005; Wassmer et al, 2005; Kaestli et al, 2006; Montgomery et al, 2006, 2007; Seydel et al, 2006; Dondorp et al, 2008; Milner et al, 2008). Similarly, understanding the causes of mortality, including the etiology and significance of increased brain volume (e.g., cerebral edema vs. other causes), has not been straightforward (Spitz, 1946; MacPherson et al, 1985; Taylor et al, 2004; Milner et al, 2012, 2013a).…”