2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-013-0485-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebellar TMS in Treatment of a Patient with Cerebellar Ataxia: Evidence from Clinical, Biomechanics and Neurophysiological Assessments

Abstract: We describe a patient with a probable diagnosis of idiopathic late-onset cerebellar atrophy who shows improvement of limb coordination, speech and gait following 21 days of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied to scalp regions presumably corresponding to the cerebellum. This case study provides, for the first time, a quantitative assessment of gait improvement in response to TMS therapy in ataxia, as well as neurophysiological evidence in support of modification of cerebello-cortical interaction tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They observed an improvement in dysmetria and tremor in the finger to nose and finger-chase tests in standing postural control and gait, evaluated kinematically and electromyographically, which were maintained at 6-month follow-up. They also assessed changes in CBI, observing a significant increase in facilitation at interstimulus intervals of 5, 6, and 7 ms (between the cerebellar and opposite motor cortex stimuli) [60].…”
Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They observed an improvement in dysmetria and tremor in the finger to nose and finger-chase tests in standing postural control and gait, evaluated kinematically and electromyographically, which were maintained at 6-month follow-up. They also assessed changes in CBI, observing a significant increase in facilitation at interstimulus intervals of 5, 6, and 7 ms (between the cerebellar and opposite motor cortex stimuli) [60].…”
Section: Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further evidence for coupling between the cerebellum and the prefrontal cortex is described in the work by Hamada and colleagues, whereby associative plasticity induced by sensory/motor stimuli paired at 25 ms -paired associative stimulation (PAS), was observed to be blocked by cerebellar-tDCS 46 . And daily sessions of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the cerebellum has been shown to improve postural control and walking, and dual-tasking in a patient with cerebellar atrophy 47 . These motor and cognitive improvements were marked by an increase in motor evoked potentials induced by motor cortical stimulation when the cerebellum was also excited a few milliseconds beforehand (investigated with dual-coil, paired-pulse TMS), due to reduced cerebellar-brain inhibition (CBI) that lasted 6 months after treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These motor and cognitive improvements were marked by an increase in motor evoked potentials induced by motor cortical stimulation when the cerebellum was also excited a few milliseconds beforehand (investigated with dual-coil, paired-pulse TMS), due to reduced cerebellar-brain inhibition (CBI) that lasted 6 months after treatment. Farzan and colleagues 47 credited the improvements in cognitive function to a consequence of enhanced motor function and the liberation of resources for the performance of the dual-task. The reduction in CBI induced by TMS may also have improved prefrontal cortical function directly, through exciting cerebro-cerebellar circuits -improving cognitive capacity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the limited literature on the use of therapeutic non-invasive cerebellar stimulation in patients [71], cerebellar TMS has shown the potential for therapeutic use, successfully alleviating ataxic symptoms [72,73] through facilitation of motor cortex excitability [74]. Conversely, a study testing the effects of anodal cerebellar tDCS on grip force in both ataxic patients and healthy controls did not reveal any effects in either group [75].…”
Section: Cerebellar Ataxiamentioning
confidence: 98%