2002
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cerebellar hemispheric activation ipsilateral to the paretic hand correlates with functional recovery after stroke

Abstract: An experimental lesion in the primary motor or sensory cortices in monkeys leads to functional reorganization in areas surrounding the lesion or in contralateral homologous regions. In humans, task-dependent brain activation after motor stroke seems to be multifocal and bilateral. Although many active structures are seen after stroke, their roles are unclear. For instance, the uninjured primary motor cortex may play a significant role in recovery or may be associated with mirror movements. Other motor areas, p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
167
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
17
167
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the mechanism is not clear enough, changes in cerebral activation induced by MT may play an important role in inducing neural plasticity. Previous functional imaging studies have suggested that several motor related areas (premotor cortex, supplementary motor areas, and cerebellum) as well as SMC contribute to motor recovery after stroke [22][23][24][25] . Therefore, it would be interesting to consider the effect of MT on these motor related areas in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the mechanism is not clear enough, changes in cerebral activation induced by MT may play an important role in inducing neural plasticity. Previous functional imaging studies have suggested that several motor related areas (premotor cortex, supplementary motor areas, and cerebellum) as well as SMC contribute to motor recovery after stroke [22][23][24][25] . Therefore, it would be interesting to consider the effect of MT on these motor related areas in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 Furthermore, evidence to support our data comes from a study in which hemiparetic patients with good recovery showed changes in the activation of the cerebellar hemisphere opposite the injured corticospinal tract, whereas patients with poor recovery did not show such changes in cerebellar activation. 74 The appearance of cerebellar activation after mental practice may reflect unmasking of pre-existing connections 75 or mechanisms of longterm potentiation, because certain forms of learning lead to an enhancement of synaptic responses in a variety of brain structures. 76-78 Recently, long-term potentiation has been shown to be involved in learning new motor skills 79 and provides compelling evidence for long-term potentiation to be a mechanism involved in natural learning.…”
Section: Brain Change Associated With Mental Practice Onlymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the extent that recovery occurs, function appears to be redistributed to parallel pathways or to new alternate pathways, or both. For example, partial recovery from the contralateral hemiparesis associated with a stroke involving the primary motor cortex sometimes involves activation of regions in the opposite, undamaged hemisphere (Pineiro et al, 2001;Feydy et al, 2002;Schaechter et al, 2002;Small et al, 2002;Foltys et al, 2003;Fujii and Nakada, 2003;Zemke et al, 2003). In other cases, activation of regions ipsilateral to the stroke occurs as new neurons are recruited to perform specific tasks (Pineiro et al, 2001;Feydy et al, 2002;Small et al, 2002;Foltys et al, 2003;Fujii and Nakada, 2003;Werhahn et al, 2003;Zemke et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%