2018
DOI: 10.1111/efp.12451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cercospora leaf spot in Toona ciliata: Epidemiology and infection process of Cercospora cf. alchemillicola

Abstract: The biology of Cercospora leaf spot (Cercospora cf. alchemillicola) of Toona ciliata was examined in terms of the effects of temperature and duration of foliage wetting on the progress of disease and the mechanism of pathogen infection. To evaluate the effect of temperature on mycelial growth, cercosporin production and conidial germination, experiments were conducted in a 4 × 5 factorial design, with four isolates (HR01, HR02, HR03 and CML3059) at five temperatures (15, 19, 23, 26 and 30°C). The area under th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After evaluating the three methodologies for the re-isolation of P. grandis-urophylla (S, WD and D), it was possible to determine that WD was superior to the other methodologies, since the area under the mycelial growth curve (AUMGC), which has been used to compare mycelial growth between different fungal isolates or treatments [31], showed higher values in comparison with the other two methods, with R showing intermediate results. This performance can be explained by the absence of disinfectants, which, besides removing any contaminants, can also unduly disrupt the target fungus [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After evaluating the three methodologies for the re-isolation of P. grandis-urophylla (S, WD and D), it was possible to determine that WD was superior to the other methodologies, since the area under the mycelial growth curve (AUMGC), which has been used to compare mycelial growth between different fungal isolates or treatments [31], showed higher values in comparison with the other two methods, with R showing intermediate results. This performance can be explained by the absence of disinfectants, which, besides removing any contaminants, can also unduly disrupt the target fungus [32].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount variability of cercosporin produced by C. coffeicola, C. piaropi, Cercospora cf. alchemillicola and Pseudocercosporella capsellae isolates has already been reported by other authors using the SPEC method (Gunasinghe et al 2016;Silva 2018;Vale et al 2019). Cercosporin biosynthesis is affected by external factors such as light, temperature, pH, nutrient supply and incubation time (Jenns et al 1989;Vale et al 2019;Zhou et al 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…14 The disease is favored by brightness, air temperature (17 to 22 °C), [15][16][17] relative humidity (>90%), 18 and free water time on plant tissue (>9 h day −1 ). 19 Factors such as nutritional imbalance, mainly nitrogen deficiency or excess potassium, water deficit (>150 mm), very clayey or sandy soils, and cold and excessive winds, can influence a Cercospora attack. 2,20,21 The fungus spreads mainly through water, rainfall, or sprinkler irrigation, and wind.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%