2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.01.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CeO2-CuO bimetal oxides derived from Ce-based MOF and their difference in catalytic activities for CO oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, incorporation of Ce and further activation of the material resulted in a highly dispersed bimetallic system of strong CeO 2 -CuO interactions that improved CO oxidation when compared to HKUST-1-derived CuO alone. Over the Ce-HKUST-1-derived CeO 2 -CuO, total CO conversion was achieved at 150 • C. Guo et al [41] obtained CeO 2 -CuO bimetallic catalysts derived from Cu supported on Ce-MOF-808 which showed 100% CO conversion above 300 • C, which is a significantly higher temperature than in the case of that reported in this work for HKUST-1-based catalysts. Zhu et al [42] synthesised Ce-UiO-66-derived CuO-CeO 2 catalysts and studied them in preferential CO oxidation (PROX).…”
Section: Catalytic Tests Of Co Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, incorporation of Ce and further activation of the material resulted in a highly dispersed bimetallic system of strong CeO 2 -CuO interactions that improved CO oxidation when compared to HKUST-1-derived CuO alone. Over the Ce-HKUST-1-derived CeO 2 -CuO, total CO conversion was achieved at 150 • C. Guo et al [41] obtained CeO 2 -CuO bimetallic catalysts derived from Cu supported on Ce-MOF-808 which showed 100% CO conversion above 300 • C, which is a significantly higher temperature than in the case of that reported in this work for HKUST-1-based catalysts. Zhu et al [42] synthesised Ce-UiO-66-derived CuO-CeO 2 catalysts and studied them in preferential CO oxidation (PROX).…”
Section: Catalytic Tests Of Co Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…For example, Zamaro et al [25] reported that HKUST-1 itself was not active in CO oxidation but that it was found to be a good matrix for obtaining well-dispersed CuO nanoparticles. In addition, In contrary to other works on CO oxidation over MOF-based catalysts that undergo in situ transformation to CeO 2 -CuO [25,41], our aim was to conduct the reaction maintaining the metal-organic framework. It was proven by the XRD analysis for H1, Ce@H1(W), and Ce@H1(D) ( Figure 12) that after catalytic tests the HKUST-1 structure was preserved; however, small intensity reflexes of CuO and Cu 2 O can be observed on the diffractogram of H1, which is due to oxidation of the BTC linker.…”
Section: Catalytic Tests Of Co Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some catalysts derived from Cebased MOFs can be used in CO oxidation. [97,[99][100][101][102][103][104] Zhang et al reported cauliflower-and strawsheave-like Ce-based catalysts derived from MOF materials with large surface areas. These porous catalysts can provide enough active sites and oxygen vacancies and exhibit excellent catalytic performance for CO oxidation.…”
Section: Harmful Gas Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ceria-based materials have found wide applications in many catalytic processes [1], such as vehicle emission purification [2], water-gas shift reactions [3], CO oxidation [4] etc. Their excellent performance primarily stems from the unique Ce 4f orbital with strong electron localization characteristics, typically exhibiting the dynamic Ce 4+ /Ce 3+ transition [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%