2020
DOI: 10.1016/s1872-2067(20)63564-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures and reactivities of the CeO2/Pt(111) reverse catalyst: A DFT+U study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Catalytic activity of Ce x O y depends upon the oxygen vacancy which directly relates to surface structure and surface active sites. 76 The variable oxidation state (Ce 3+ and Ce 4+ ) of Ce confirmed the presence of oxygen vacancies in Ce x O y , as calculated from XPS. This suggests the active sites are available for oxygen adsorption and activation in the process of catalytic transformation to pyran.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Go-ce X O Y -Pt Catalystmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Catalytic activity of Ce x O y depends upon the oxygen vacancy which directly relates to surface structure and surface active sites. 76 The variable oxidation state (Ce 3+ and Ce 4+ ) of Ce confirmed the presence of oxygen vacancies in Ce x O y , as calculated from XPS. This suggests the active sites are available for oxygen adsorption and activation in the process of catalytic transformation to pyran.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Go-ce X O Y -Pt Catalystmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…It is generally recognized that the CO oxidation of the ceria-based catalysts follows the M–vK mechanism. 20,59 In this section, we first studied the CO oxidation process following the M–vK mechanism for Pt 13 /CeO 2 . Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 However, Zheng et al found that CO oxidation was unfavourable over CeO 2 /Pt(111) due to the high E vac (2.83 eV) of the CeO 2 support surface. 20 Hence, lowering E vac is key to improving CO oxidation activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All spin polarization calculations were conducted using the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP), where the electron exchange–correlation was described by Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional using the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) approach. , The project-augmented wave (PAW) method described the core–valence electron interaction with the Ti (3p, 3d, 4s); O (2s, 2p); and H (1s) shells being treated as valence electrons. , The occupancy of the single-electron states was calculated using a Gaussian smearing method with SIGMA of 0.05 eV, and the valence electronic states were extended in the plane wave basis set with an energy cutoff of 450 eV. An on-site Hubbard U term (PBE + U ) was added to the O 2p orbitals with a value of 6.3 eV to eliminate self-interaction errors and facilitate the localization of trapped holes, in agreement with our previous studies. Transition states were searched using a constrained optimization scheme, , and the calculations were converged until the atomic forces were less than 0.05 eV/Å. Dipole corrections were applied throughout the calculations to eliminate the polarization effect on the calculated results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%