2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.368300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CEO Turnover and Properties of Accounting Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
154
2
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(60 reference statements)
23
154
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Lambert and Larcker (1987) and Sloan (1993), among others, provide evidence suggesting that optimal compensation contracts place less reliance on performance measures when they contain considerable noise. Engel et al (2002) make a similar argument concerning the CEO turnover decision. We extend this argument to suggest that the uncertainty associated with earnings forecasts impacts the degree to which boards hold CEOs accountable for firm performance expectations in the CEO turnover decision.…”
Section: One-year Forecast Errors As a Measure Of Ceo Performancementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Lambert and Larcker (1987) and Sloan (1993), among others, provide evidence suggesting that optimal compensation contracts place less reliance on performance measures when they contain considerable noise. Engel et al (2002) make a similar argument concerning the CEO turnover decision. We extend this argument to suggest that the uncertainty associated with earnings forecasts impacts the degree to which boards hold CEOs accountable for firm performance expectations in the CEO turnover decision.…”
Section: One-year Forecast Errors As a Measure Of Ceo Performancementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Their analysis therefore suggests a role for accounting information to facilitate the board's learning from price in order to make a more informed turnover decision. 29 In another recent study, Engel, Hayes, and Wang (2003) examine the relationship between the weight placed on accounting and market return information in the CEO turnover decision and the relative sensitivity and precision of these measures. Their tests are motivated by moral hazard models with multiple signals (e.g., Holmstrom, 1979;Banker and Datar, 1989), which stress that the optimal aggregation of signals is in relation to their sensitivity to the agent's action relative to the precision with which the signal captures that action (or the signal-to-noise ratio).…”
Section: Accounting-based Performance Measures In Executive Compensatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the firm's stock return prior to the announcement of the restatement (month Ϫ12 to Ϫ1) as our measure of prior performance (STKPERF1). We also use the firm's ROA in the year preceding the announcement of the restatement as an additional measure of prior performance, as Engel et al (2003) find that both market-based and accounting-based measures of performance are important in explaining CEO turnover.…”
Section: Logistic Regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample and control firms in this study likely face a similar economic environment, given that control firms are selected based on industry, size and age. 12 We do not include a variable for CEO age or an indicator variable for CEOs over the age 64 as in Engel et al (2003) and Murphy and Zimmerman (1993) for two reasons. First, our dependent variable is at the firm level rather than the individual executive level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%