2021
DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2021.1966368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CEO power and corporate social responsibility decoupling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following control variables are applied, following prior literature (Li et al, 2021;McGuinness et al, 2017;Shahab et al, 2021;Yu, 2008;M. Zhang et al, 2015): firm size (SIZE), return on total assets (ROA), financial leverage (LEV), firm growth (GROWTH), independent directors' percentage among the board (INDEP), years of listing (AGE), CEO duality (DUAL), institutional ownership (INST), and corporate ownership type (SOE), as well as year fixed effects (YEAR) and industry dummies (INDUSTRY).…”
Section: Control Variables and Baseline Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following control variables are applied, following prior literature (Li et al, 2021;McGuinness et al, 2017;Shahab et al, 2021;Yu, 2008;M. Zhang et al, 2015): firm size (SIZE), return on total assets (ROA), financial leverage (LEV), firm growth (GROWTH), independent directors' percentage among the board (INDEP), years of listing (AGE), CEO duality (DUAL), institutional ownership (INST), and corporate ownership type (SOE), as well as year fixed effects (YEAR) and industry dummies (INDUSTRY).…”
Section: Control Variables and Baseline Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…External actions generally focus on communication and visible disclosure that firms adopt to create a good reputation in the views of the public, including the commitment and statement of CSR practices and so on, which reflects firm’s CSD level. There are three main types of definition for CSR decoupling: (1) the difference between a firm’s CSD level rated by third-party ratings and its actual CSR performance or inputs ( García-Sánchez et al, 2020 ; Zhong et al, 2021 ); (2) the difference between internal (e.g., employee welfare expenditure) and external CSR actions (e.g., employee improvement commitment; Sánchez et al, 2021 ; Shahab et al, 2021 ); (3) the difference between level of optimistic tone from CSR reports and CSR performance ( Sauerwald and Su, 2019 ; Zhang, 2021 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Tashman et al (2019) based on the neo-institutional theory, argue that institutional characteristics in different markets drive CSR decoupling of multinational enterprises. Based on the agency theory, Shahab et al (2021) argue that more powerful CEOs are more short-sighted and have higher CSR decoupling in their firms; Parra-Domínguez et al (2021) find that CSR decoupling is lower in family firms, because the family firms suffer lower agency cost. Based on the overconfidence theory, Sauerwald and Su (2019) find that managerial overconfidence increases CSR decoupling.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, information asymmetry not only increases the financial constraint for the firm but also increases the cost associated with the financing of the projects (Myers and Majluf, 1984). Due to the information asymmetry, managers take the additional funds from capital providers and use them for empire-building and decoupling activities (Shahab et al, 2021). On the contrary, if capital providers are aware of information asymmetry, they restrict capital to the managers.…”
Section: Contextual Settings Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%