1999
DOI: 10.3208/sandf.39.3_75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centrifuge Model Tests on Double Propped Wall Excavation in Soft Clay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Draining it simulates excavation. Coefficient of lateral stress is always 1.0 Kimuara et al (1993); Loh et al (1998); Takemura et al (1999) in-flight excavator…”
Section: = C U / Mobmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Draining it simulates excavation. Coefficient of lateral stress is always 1.0 Kimuara et al (1993); Loh et al (1998); Takemura et al (1999) in-flight excavator…”
Section: = C U / Mobmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same context, Schurmann and Jesberger have performed centrifuged tests to study the pressure profiles developed on a sheet piling driven into dry sand during excavation [11]. In the same period, a qualitative step forward was given to this technique and mainly relates to the first excavator device operating during flight for studying centrifuged excavations models developed by Kimura et al; [12].This tool was used in other studies including those conducted by Takemura et al, [13]. During the year 1998, it became possible to study the three dimensional behavior of structure as done by Loh et al, to observe the behavior of two free standing retaining walls, stuck in a reconsolidated kaolin clay [14].…”
Section: Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6. Once the whole model preparation was completed, the model was placed on a centrifuge platform and spun up to 50 g using the Mark III centrifuge at the Tokyo Institute of Technology (Takemura et al, 1999). Hereafter, the data of the displacements are presented in the model scale unless otherwise stated.…”
Section: Model and Test Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%