2014
DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2013.842680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centrifugal force spinning of PA6 nanofibers – processability and morphology of solution-spun fibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
50
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nanofiber spinning tests were conducted using a Cyclone L-1000 M/D laboratory Forcespinning machine (FibeRio Technology Corp., McAllen, TX) in a factorial design with the solution concentration, spinneret rotation speed, and spinneret needle gage as independent variables. Detailed discussion of the selected predictor variable combinations was presented in (Hammami et al, 2014). In summary, three levels of spinning solution concentration were tested, i.e.…”
Section: Spinning Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nanofiber spinning tests were conducted using a Cyclone L-1000 M/D laboratory Forcespinning machine (FibeRio Technology Corp., McAllen, TX) in a factorial design with the solution concentration, spinneret rotation speed, and spinneret needle gage as independent variables. Detailed discussion of the selected predictor variable combinations was presented in (Hammami et al, 2014). In summary, three levels of spinning solution concentration were tested, i.e.…”
Section: Spinning Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is different from the case of electrospinning, where the draw ratio is controlled by the electric fields, independently from the material delivery rate controlled through the syringe pump. These conflicting phenomena have been evidenced in recent studies focusing on Forcespinning, where the spinneret rotation speed appeared to have little effect on fiber diameter (Hammami, Krifa, & Harzallah, 2014;Shanmuganathan et al, 2012), while other studies indicate the potential for a significant impact (McEachin & Lozano, 2012;Padron et al, 2011Padron et al, , 2012. Shanmuganathan et al (2012) investigated melt Forcespinning of Poly(butylene terephthalate) and noted that melt temperature may be a more important determinant of fiber diameter than spinneret rotation speed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With advantages of low cost and high e±ciency, centrifugal spinning technology has been developed from the initial preparing arti¯cial hair to the recent fabricating nano¯ber membranes. 55,56 Ou et al 57 reported for the¯rst time on the fabrication of a robust, thermo-responsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) hydrogel-coated PU membrane by centrifugal spinning for e®ective separation of oil/water emulsions. The reason of selecting thermoplastic PU was its high tensile strength, wear resistance and good°exibility over a wide temperature range.…”
Section: Centrifugal Spinning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, various technologies have been applied in preparing nanober membranes, including centrifugal force spinning, [22][23][24] phase separation, 25-27 electrospinning 28-30 and melt blending extrusion. [31][32][33] The melt-blending extrusion method for preparing various kinds of polymer nanobers is environment friendly, highly efficient, versatile and continuous.…”
Section: -21mentioning
confidence: 99%