1989
DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(89)90049-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centrifugal and centripetal mechanisms involved in the ‘gating’ of cortical SEPs during movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As in previous studies of either afferent or efferent gating (Abbruzzese et al 1980(Abbruzzese et al , 1981Burke et al 1982;Cohen and Starr 1987;Hsieh et al 1995;Insola et al 2004;Jones et al 1989;Klostermann et al 2002a;Tapia et al 1987), there were no changes in the latencies of any subcortical or cortical responses, nor in the amplitude of the braquial plexus response (N9), indicating that the gating effect is mediated only by central structures. In particular, an interaction between lemniscal and spinocerebellar inputs has been suggested to occur at a thalamic level Okajima et al 1991).…”
Section: Interactions Between Muscle and Cutaneous Afferent Volleyssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…As in previous studies of either afferent or efferent gating (Abbruzzese et al 1980(Abbruzzese et al , 1981Burke et al 1982;Cohen and Starr 1987;Hsieh et al 1995;Insola et al 2004;Jones et al 1989;Klostermann et al 2002a;Tapia et al 1987), there were no changes in the latencies of any subcortical or cortical responses, nor in the amplitude of the braquial plexus response (N9), indicating that the gating effect is mediated only by central structures. In particular, an interaction between lemniscal and spinocerebellar inputs has been suggested to occur at a thalamic level Okajima et al 1991).…”
Section: Interactions Between Muscle and Cutaneous Afferent Volleyssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…While phase resetting to the onset of an external stimulus may reflect sensation (23), early components of the averaged ERP are traditionally used to assess "gating" of sensation preceding and during motor movements (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). For example, Rosini et al noted that early (<50ms) somatosensory ERPs to median nerve shocks are reduced contra-laterally, but not ipsi-laterally, during motor movement conditions compared to conditions with no-motor movement, suggesting that the gating of sensation is specific to the contra-lateral hemisphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas attenuation of SEPs during movement may arise at peripheral as well as central levels ("centripetal gating"; Jones et al, 1989), pre-movement SEP suppression occurs prior to movement and the arrival of peripheral feedback, thus suggesting a central "centrifugal" mechanism (Cohen and Starr, 1987, Shimazu et al, 1999, Wasaka et al, 2003. Voss et al (2006) used transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate the characteristics of the efferent motor signal causing sensory attenuation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since ssVEPs are elicited by sustained trains of repetitive stimuli, they provide a continuous measure of the modulation of sensory function by attentional processes (Müller et al, 1998). In the domain of sensorimotor function, amplitude modulations of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) have been used to probe the state of the sensorimotor system during the preparation and execution of movement (Böcker et al, 1993;Cheron and Borenstein, 1987;Cohen and Starr, 1987;Jones et al, 1989;Shimazu et al, 1999). Here, the use of a continuous measure, rather than intermittent probes by means of transient evoked responses, would potentially have a similar advantage as the use of ssVEPs in visual selective attention research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%