2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Movement-related changes in cortical excitability: A steady-state SEP approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This response is thought to result from synchronized periodic activity generated in neuronal populations responding to the periodically-modulated feature [23]. In the somatosensory modality, several studies have used SS-EPs to characterize the cortical activity related to the perception of pure mechanical vibrations [24][25][26] or electrical stimulation [27,28]. The majority of these studies have focused on frequencies around 20 Hz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This response is thought to result from synchronized periodic activity generated in neuronal populations responding to the periodically-modulated feature [23]. In the somatosensory modality, several studies have used SS-EPs to characterize the cortical activity related to the perception of pure mechanical vibrations [24][25][26] or electrical stimulation [27,28]. The majority of these studies have focused on frequencies around 20 Hz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, sensorimotor synchronization to the beat is supported in the human brain by two distinct neural activities: an activity elicited at beat frequency probably involved in beat processing and a distinct neural activity elicited at a frequency corresponding to the movement and probably involved in the production of synchronized movements [52][53][54][59][60][61] (figure 4). Most importantly, there is evidence for an interaction between sensory-and movement-related activities when participants tap to the beat, in the form of (i) an additional peak appearing at 3.6 Hz, compatible with a nonlinear product of sensorimotor integration (i.e.…”
Section: Neural Entrainment Underlying Sensorimotor Synchronization Tmentioning
confidence: 99%