2017
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2016.2539947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Centralized Disturbance Detection in Smart Microgrids With Noisy and Intermittent Synchrophasor Data

Abstract: Microgrids are prone to network-wide disturbances such as voltage and frequency deviations. Detection of disturbances by a microgrid central controller (MGCC) is therefore necessary for improving the network operation. Motivated by this application, this paper presents a new structure for the centralized detection of disturbances with noisy synchrophasor data and packet delay/dropouts. We build the proposed structure starting from the analysis of noise-delay tradeoff in synchrophasor networks, and developing a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The control strategy of microgrids works on the basis of a hierarchical control scheme, that includes primary/inner controllers and secondary and tertiary control levels [5]- [7]. Previous secondary control strategies were proposed based on centralized control (with low reliability) [8], [9], decentralized control (with high reliability and reasonable cost) [4]- [7], [10], [11] and distributed control (with high reliability and low cost) [12]- [22]. The idea of distributed control is inspired partly by the idea of cooperative control for multi-agent systems (MASs) and is based on communication among local controllers (LC) that share information with neighboring units via local communication networks [23], [24].…”
Section: A Motivation and Incitementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control strategy of microgrids works on the basis of a hierarchical control scheme, that includes primary/inner controllers and secondary and tertiary control levels [5]- [7]. Previous secondary control strategies were proposed based on centralized control (with low reliability) [8], [9], decentralized control (with high reliability and reasonable cost) [4]- [7], [10], [11] and distributed control (with high reliability and low cost) [12]- [22]. The idea of distributed control is inspired partly by the idea of cooperative control for multi-agent systems (MASs) and is based on communication among local controllers (LC) that share information with neighboring units via local communication networks [23], [24].…”
Section: A Motivation and Incitementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current serial communications deployed in SCADA systems refer to a set of legacy standards that are still used for low data rate applications and asynchronous bit transfer. Since microgrid operations need timely control actions, a Real-Time Measurement Parameters (RTMP) function is required [21]. To reach this goal, it´s mandatory to know which bandwidth and which latency (delay) can tolerate each microgrid application [22], [23], i.e., each microgrid function has its own latency and bandwidth requirement depending on the kind of system response it´s dealing with [12], [24], [25].…”
Section: Towards An Intelligent Microgridmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To control and monitor the intelligent microgrid, a Real-Time Measurement Parameters (RTMP) function is required [69,70]. To reach this objective, it is mandatory to know what bandwidth (used to signify the data rate in bits/second) and what latency (delay) the transmitted data may have among the microgrid components (DERs) for each microgrid function [71][72][73].…”
Section: Network Requirements For Smart Microgridsmentioning
confidence: 99%