2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central nodes and surprise in content selection in social networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(2014), Figueiredo et al . (2015), Frankort (2008), Ho et al . (2006), Kalish and Robins (2006), Kleinbaum and Stuart (2014), Li et al .…”
Section: Discussion Of Structural Holes Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2014), Figueiredo et al . (2015), Frankort (2008), Ho et al . (2006), Kalish and Robins (2006), Kleinbaum and Stuart (2014), Li et al .…”
Section: Discussion Of Structural Holes Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…its direct and indirect contacts) represents an individual access which can be measured by the network constraint developed by Burt et al (1998), Burt (2008) and Burt and Merluzzi (2016). The first-type of constraint, network constraint is the most widespread measure in the literature, and is at the core of many works such as Aarstad (2014), Bizzi (2013), Buskens and van de Rijt (2008), Bruggeman et al (2003), Chung et al (2009), Chunlei et al (2014), Figueiredo et al (2015), Frankort (2008), Ho et al (2006), Kalish and Robins (2006), Kleinbaum and Stuart (2014), Li et al (2017), Mascia and Cicchetti (2011), Rost (2011) and Tortoriello (2015). Ucinet and Pajek software is used frequently to compute network constraint scores.…”
Section: Structural Holes Measures In Ego-networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then explored the role of individuals' network centrality, measured by the average friend number in the observation period (Jackson 2008), in the relationship between emotions and article cascades. Empirical evidence suggests that users' network centrality can affect the decisions of whether to share online content with different characteristic (Figueiredo et al 2015) and lead to larger information cascades (Banerjee et al 2013). Individuals with greater network centrality often have higher social status and exert increased social influence in adoption decisions (Hu and Van den Bulte 2014, Huang et al 2020).…”
Section: Unveiling Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os indivíduos que apresentam elevado grau de contato na rede social, ou seja, relacionam-se intensamente com os demais membros da rede, ocupam posições mais centrais (Figueiredo, Chen, & Azevedo, 2015). Essas pessoas estão em vantagem em relação aos membros mais periféricos, pois o elevado nível de relacionamento na rede permite que seus colegas de trabalho estejam familiarizados com suas ideias e cientes dos seus pontos de vista.…”
Section: Redes Sociais E Adequação Indivíduo-organizaçãounclassified
“…Além disso, funcionários com elevado grau de relacionamento no trabalho possuem acesso direto aos recursos e demonstram certa independência (Figueiredo et al, 2015). Segundo Perry-Smith e Mannucci (2015), a independência em relação aos colegas de trabalho está relacionada com a percepção de liberdade.…”
Section: Redes Sociais E Adequação Indivíduo-organizaçãounclassified