2021
DOI: 10.1186/s41927-021-00187-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central Aspects of Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAP-RA): protocol for a prospective observational study

Abstract: Background Pain and fatigue are persistent problems in people with rheumatoid arthritis. Central sensitisation (CS) may contribute to pain and fatigue, even when treatment has controlled inflammatory disease. This study aims to validate a self-report 8-item questionnaire, the Central Aspects of Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CAP-RA) questionnaire, developed to measure central pain mechanisms in RA, and to predict patient outcomes and response to treatment. A secondary objective is to explore mec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is probably due to the hope that improving control of inflammatory disease might resolve other problematic symptoms, and maybe also the challenges of identifying people with definite central sensitization. Additional tools to identify people with central mechanism traits in clinical practice are being developed and would provide a means to identify individuals who may require additional treatments beyond peripheral pain and inflammation [ 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably due to the hope that improving control of inflammatory disease might resolve other problematic symptoms, and maybe also the challenges of identifying people with definite central sensitization. Additional tools to identify people with central mechanism traits in clinical practice are being developed and would provide a means to identify individuals who may require additional treatments beyond peripheral pain and inflammation [ 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%