2013
DOI: 10.1097/opx.0000000000000039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central and Paracentral Corneal Curvature Changes During Orthokeratology

Abstract: OK induces non-uniform corneal changes to the central and paracentral regions. This non-uniformity may influence peripheral refraction profiles reported with OK that have been suggested to be influential in myopia control.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
32
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
8
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…But Chen et al recently reported variations in the Q-values for different regions of the anterior corneal surface, indicating that a single value could not precisely reflect corneal Q-value. [9,17] Consistent with this finding, we found that the average Q-value was comparable between eyes with and without decentration, but the corneal Q-value differences between nasal–temporal and superior–inferior quadrants were significantly higher in eyes with lens decentration, which indicated a more aspheric surface of the temporal and inferior quadrants. Importantly, this finding explains why orthokeratology lens prefer to shift to the temporal and inferior quadrants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…But Chen et al recently reported variations in the Q-values for different regions of the anterior corneal surface, indicating that a single value could not precisely reflect corneal Q-value. [9,17] Consistent with this finding, we found that the average Q-value was comparable between eyes with and without decentration, but the corneal Q-value differences between nasal–temporal and superior–inferior quadrants were significantly higher in eyes with lens decentration, which indicated a more aspheric surface of the temporal and inferior quadrants. Importantly, this finding explains why orthokeratology lens prefer to shift to the temporal and inferior quadrants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…[1] As an external object placed against the front surface of the cornea, orthokeratology lens is expected to cause certain changes in the anterior segment parameters, such as corneal curvature and thickness. Previous studies have reported flattened corneal curvature, [2,3] reduced central corneal thickness (CCT), and increased thickness in the mid-peripheral cornea after orthokeratology. [4,5] There are also studies showing a thinned central epithelial layer [6,7] and thickened corneal stromal layer [8,9] after wearing orthokeratology lens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have suggested that various ocular parameters (corneal thickness in particular) are modifiable or predictive values for myopic reduction in orthokeratology [212223242526]. In 2000, Lui and Edwards [21] reported that CCT is the most predictive value of myopic reduction based on the results of a randomized controlled clinical trial involving 14 subjects who wore orthokeratology lenses during the daytime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%