2017
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000006907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The relationship between corneal biomechanics and anterior segment parameters in the early stage of orthokeratology

Abstract: To investigate the relationship between corneal biomechanics and anterior segment parameters in the early stage of overnight orthokeratology.Twenty-three eyes from 23 subjects were involved in the study. Corneal biomechanics, including corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF), and parameters of the anterior segment, including corneal curvature, central corneal thickness (CCT), and corneal sublayers’ thickness, were measured at baseline and day 1 and 7 after wearing orthokeratology lens. One-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
15
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors found that the main change in corneal thickness was in the corneal epithelium after OK lens wear [2,9,17,18]. However, there is still no internationally unified view on how the corneal epithelium is redistributed after lens wear [16,[19][20][21][22]. Lian et al [16] found central, horizontal, and vertical meridian epithelium thinning, horizontal meridian nasal temporal side paracentral epithelial thickening, and above vertical meridian paracentral epithelium thinning at 1 month of lens wear by UHR-OCT. Chen et al [19] found that the central epithelium thinned and the corneal stroma thickened at 1 day of lens wear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors found that the main change in corneal thickness was in the corneal epithelium after OK lens wear [2,9,17,18]. However, there is still no internationally unified view on how the corneal epithelium is redistributed after lens wear [16,[19][20][21][22]. Lian et al [16] found central, horizontal, and vertical meridian epithelium thinning, horizontal meridian nasal temporal side paracentral epithelial thickening, and above vertical meridian paracentral epithelium thinning at 1 month of lens wear by UHR-OCT. Chen et al [19] found that the central epithelium thinned and the corneal stroma thickened at 1 day of lens wear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is still no internationally unified view on how the corneal epithelium is redistributed after lens wear [16,[19][20][21][22]. Lian et al [16] found central, horizontal, and vertical meridian epithelium thinning, horizontal meridian nasal temporal side paracentral epithelial thickening, and above vertical meridian paracentral epithelium thinning at 1 month of lens wear by UHR-OCT. Chen et al [19] found that the central epithelium thinned and the corneal stroma thickened at 1 day of lens wear. Nieto-Bona et al [20] observed that the central 2 mm corneal epithelium was thinning, while there was no obvious change in corneal stroma by confocal microscope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After orthokeratology, the corneal epithelium is reduced 29,30 , but the corneal stroma thickens 31,32 . These changes in the morphological and histological properties of the cornea may alter its biomechanical properties 33 . The current study applied both a dynamic bidirectional corneal applanation technology (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17]. Lian Y[10] found central, horizontal, and vertical meridian epithelium thinning, horizontal meridian nasal temporal side paracentral epithelial thickening, and above vertical meridian paracentral epithelium thinning at 1 mo of lens wear by UHR-OCT. Chen R[14] found that the central epithelium thinned and the corneal stroma thickened at 1 day of lens wear. Nieto-Bona-A[15] observed that the central 2-mm corneal epithelium was thinning, while there was no obvious change in corneal stroma by confocal microscope.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%