2014
DOI: 10.1038/nn.3767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central amygdala PKC-δ+ neurons mediate the influence of multiple anorexigenic signals

Abstract: Feeding can be inhibited by multiple cues, including those associated with satiety, sickness or unpalatable food. How such anorexigenic signals inhibit feeding at the neural circuit level is incompletely understood. While some inhibitory circuits have been identified, it is not yet clear whether distinct anorexigenic influences are processed in a convergent or parallel manner. The amygdala central nucleus (CEA) has been implicated in feeding control, but its role is controversial. The lateral subdivision of CE… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
350
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 321 publications
(368 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
17
350
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also labelled other CeAl-specific genetic markers, such as SOM, and Tackykinin 2 (Tac2) by genetic labelling, and PKC-δ with immunohistochemical staining. Immunolabelled PKC-δ virtually recapitulates what is observed with its genetic labeling (Cai et al, 2014), allowing for its comparison with knock-in tdTomato reporters. These genetic markers were all expressed in the CeAl, but the number of labelled neurons and their spatial distribution were different for each marker (Figure 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We also labelled other CeAl-specific genetic markers, such as SOM, and Tackykinin 2 (Tac2) by genetic labelling, and PKC-δ with immunohistochemical staining. Immunolabelled PKC-δ virtually recapitulates what is observed with its genetic labeling (Cai et al, 2014), allowing for its comparison with knock-in tdTomato reporters. These genetic markers were all expressed in the CeAl, but the number of labelled neurons and their spatial distribution were different for each marker (Figure 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This arrangement is observed in AgRP ‘hunger’ neurons 22 and in that case separate projections to distinct brain regions contribute to various aspects of hunger-related behaviors and physiology 3133 . CGRP PBN neurons project to the CeA and BNST 3,7 , nuclei that mediate behavioral and physiological responses to ingestive and fear-related stimuli 7,8,34 . Downstream CeA neurons express the CGRP receptor 7 , and a subpopulation of those neurons co-express protein kinase C-δ 7,35 , but the identity of downstream BNST neurons is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several putative mechanisms through which the CeA might increase incentive salience have been suggested, involving direct and indirect modulation of mesocorticolimbic (33,34) and brainstem circuits (25,35). Interestingly, in addition to driving sodium and sucrose wanting, the CeA also plays a role in inhibiting feeding in response to satiety cues, conditioned taste aversion, and other anorexigenic signals (36); however, whether these roles involve inhibiting MOR signaling or downstream effects in this region remains to be determined. Intrinsic enkephalin neurons are the major source of endogenous ligand for MORs within the CeA (37,38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%