1990
DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1260083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central action of thyrotrophin-releasing hormone on growth hormone secretion in domestic fowl

Abstract: Peripheral plasma concentrations of GH in adult chickens were increased, in a dose-related manner, between 5 and 30 min after the intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of 0.1 or 10 micrograms TRH. In contrast, i.v. administration of comparable doses of TRH had no significant effect on circulating GH concentrations. [3H]3-methyl-histidine2-TRH [( 3H]Me-TRH) was located in the pituitary gland and peripheral plasma within 5 min of its i.c.v. administration, although in amounts that were unlikely to affect di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An extrapituitary action of ghrelin that suppresses the in vivo GH response of chicks to ghrelin is, however, suggested by the observation that the GH response to ghrelin in vitro (over four orders of magnitude) differed from the in vivo response (over two orders of magnitude). This contrasts with the in vivo GH-releasing activity of TRH in chickens, which is known to be partly due to stimulatory actions at CNS sites (Harvey et al 1990). Although this also contrasts with the central actions of GH secretagogue receptor agonists in chickens (Geris et al 2001), both stimulatory and inhibitory actions of GH secretagogues on SRIF release have been observed in rats (Bluet-Pajot et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…An extrapituitary action of ghrelin that suppresses the in vivo GH response of chicks to ghrelin is, however, suggested by the observation that the GH response to ghrelin in vitro (over four orders of magnitude) differed from the in vivo response (over two orders of magnitude). This contrasts with the in vivo GH-releasing activity of TRH in chickens, which is known to be partly due to stimulatory actions at CNS sites (Harvey et al 1990). Although this also contrasts with the central actions of GH secretagogue receptor agonists in chickens (Geris et al 2001), both stimulatory and inhibitory actions of GH secretagogues on SRIF release have been observed in rats (Bluet-Pajot et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These results are therefore likely to reflect actions of pGlu-Glu-ProNH2 at extra pituitary sites within the brain. Although TRH stimulated GH release at hypothalamic sites (Leung et al 1985;Harvey et al 1990) it may simultaneously increase inhibitory hypothalamic tone by receptor-mediated mechanisms sensitive to pGlu-Glu-ProNH2 antagonism. The inhibitory action of TRH on GH-releasing factor neurones (Ishikawa et al 1987;Shioda et al 1987) may, for instance, be antagonized by pGlu-Glu-ProNH2, as may the stimulatory action of TRH on SRIF release (Knudtzen & Hanssen, 1983;Katakami et al 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, direct action of TRH on somatotrope function has been reported in amphibians 108 and reptiles 48 as well as in birds. TRH seems to be equipotent to GHRH 109 in the case of chickens 110 but not in fowl 110–113 . In mammals, TRH has been demonstrated to stimulate GH release in cattle 114 and in sheep 73,115,116 .…”
Section: Regulation Of Gh Secretionmentioning
confidence: 99%