2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-020-02173-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cemented Paste Backfill 1-D Consolidation Results Interpreted in the Context of Ground Reaction Curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not possible to provide ranges of the potential spikes of pressure at this point in time as the effects are data limited. However, as noted in Jafari et al (2020), the amount of stress within the backfill of a stope, due to a seismic event, will be dependent on the closure and the modulus of the backfill. When backfill has a low modulus (low strength at early stages of cure) the increase in stress due to closure is low compared to when the backfill has a higher modulus (final strength).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not possible to provide ranges of the potential spikes of pressure at this point in time as the effects are data limited. However, as noted in Jafari et al (2020), the amount of stress within the backfill of a stope, due to a seismic event, will be dependent on the closure and the modulus of the backfill. When backfill has a low modulus (low strength at early stages of cure) the increase in stress due to closure is low compared to when the backfill has a higher modulus (final strength).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e previous studies showed that the mechanical properties of CPB depend on its physical and chemical characteristics of the binder type, particle size, water content, and tailings' mineralogy [3,10,14,16,19,20]. ese mechanical properties vary significantly with the binder content and curing time.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of CPB has been studied quite extensively (e.g., Kesimal et al (2005); Klein and Simon (2006); Orejarena and Fall (2010); Yi et al (2015); Gorakhki and Bareither (2017); and Xu et al (2018)), in part because it is the least resource intensive, but also because there are many limit equilibrium design methods that depend on UCS as a key input (e.g., Mitchell et al (1982) and Potvin et al (2005)). Less attention has been paid to tests that study mechanical properties and effects of cemented bond breakage on the behavior of cured CPB under more complex loading conditions (Pierce et al 1998;Yilmaz et al 2010;Yilmaz et al 2015;Fang and Fall 2020;Jafari et al 2020a;Jafari et al 2020b). Therefore, new information about CPB's response to high confining pressures is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, new information about CPB's response to high confining pressures is needed. Jafari et al (2020a) showed how laboratory oedometer test results could be used to understand the backfill-rock mass interaction for tabular ore bodies undergoing predominantly one-dimensional compression. In this work a similar approach is used to understand how backfill in massive orebodies would respond to predominantly isotropic loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation