1986
DOI: 10.1177/004051758605601207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellulose Packing Density in the Secondary Wall of Never Dried Cotton Fibers

Abstract: This quantitative study of the cellulose content of secondary walls of never dried cotton fibers uses a technique based on colorimetry. The study reveals that the density of cellulose, i.e., the mass of cellulose per volume of secondary wall, is identical for all never dried cotton fibers and independent of the genotype. Various plant growth conditions do not influence this cellulose density. For samples of never dried fibers with a given mean length, the mean secondary wall thickness is an accurate indicator … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in comparison to G. hirsutum, G. barbadense fiber has less loosely-bound xyloglucan (Avci et al 2013) and pectin with a lower level of esterification near the onset of secondary wall deposition (Liu et al 2013). The density of crystalline cellulose (mass per unit volume) in the dried fibers of both species was similar (*1.52 g cm -3 ) (Peeters and De Langhe 1986). However, there are other indications of biophysical differences: during enzymatic hydrolysis of neverdried fiber with a fungal cellulase solution, G. hirsutum fiber released glucose more rapidly than G. barbadense fiber.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in comparison to G. hirsutum, G. barbadense fiber has less loosely-bound xyloglucan (Avci et al 2013) and pectin with a lower level of esterification near the onset of secondary wall deposition (Liu et al 2013). The density of crystalline cellulose (mass per unit volume) in the dried fibers of both species was similar (*1.52 g cm -3 ) (Peeters and De Langhe 1986). However, there are other indications of biophysical differences: during enzymatic hydrolysis of neverdried fiber with a fungal cellulase solution, G. hirsutum fiber released glucose more rapidly than G. barbadense fiber.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could indicate that for this species the output of nucieotar material into the cytoplasm is more intense at this stage of development than for G, arboreum and G, barbadense. In fact, total volume and secondary wall volume, which are reliable parameters for characterizing fiber expansion and secondary wail cellulose (Peeters et al, 1986a), were greatest for G, hirsutum. No considerable changes in the behavior of the nucleolus were observed 20 days after anthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, the sub‐optimum night temperatures in the boll development process cannot be compensated by high day temperatures. The rate of cellulose synthesis, therefore, appears to be the key to cotton fiber structure40–50 and a useful factor in determining the location specificity of cotton varieties, although the weight‐molecular distribution of cellulose around the fiber axis has also been proposed to affect the tensile strength of cotton fibers 50. With the advent of open‐end spinning technology, the emphasis on breeding cotton varieties for increased staple length has reversed in favor of breeding types for increased tensile strength of fibers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%