2008
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/018093-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellulose modulates biofilm formation by counteracting curli-mediated colonization of solid surfaces in Escherichia coli

Abstract: In enterobacteria, the CsgD protein activates production of two extracellular structures: thin aggregative fimbriae (curli) and cellulose. While curli fibres promote biofilm formation and cell aggregation, the evidence for a direct role of cellulose as an additional determinant for biofilm formation is not as straightforward. The MG1655 laboratory strain of Escherichia coli only produces limited amounts of curli and cellulose; however, ectopic csgD expression results in strong stimulation of curli and cellulos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
136
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
136
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2). In contrast, inactivation of genes responsible for either cellulose (DbcsA) or PNAG biosynthesis (DpgaA) did not affect the red phenotype of the parental strain, consistent with previous observations that in E. coli MG1655, CR binding mostly depends on curli production (Gualdi et al, 2008;Ma & Wood, 2009). Plasmid-driven expression of DGCs resulted in very different effects on colony phenotype on CR media: expression of the AdrA protein conferred a red phenotype upon the csgA mutant strain, but not upon the DcsgA DbcsA double mutant, consistent with its role as an activator of cellulose production (Zogaj et al, 2001;Antoniani et al, 2010).…”
Section: Effects Of Dgc Overexpression On Cell Surfaceassociated Strusupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2). In contrast, inactivation of genes responsible for either cellulose (DbcsA) or PNAG biosynthesis (DpgaA) did not affect the red phenotype of the parental strain, consistent with previous observations that in E. coli MG1655, CR binding mostly depends on curli production (Gualdi et al, 2008;Ma & Wood, 2009). Plasmid-driven expression of DGCs resulted in very different effects on colony phenotype on CR media: expression of the AdrA protein conferred a red phenotype upon the csgA mutant strain, but not upon the DcsgA DbcsA double mutant, consistent with its role as an activator of cellulose production (Zogaj et al, 2001;Antoniani et al, 2010).…”
Section: Effects Of Dgc Overexpression On Cell Surfaceassociated Strusupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Indeed, in curli-producing strains of E. coli, EPS overproduction can result in the loss of the red colony phenotype on CR medium, possibly due to shielding of curli fibres (Gualdi et al, 2008;Ma & Wood, 2009). To understand whether YddV-dependent loss of the red colony phenotype on CR medium could indeed be due to PNAG overproduction, we verified EPS production in the presence and absence of the pYddV plasmid by plating on agar medium supplemented with CF, a fluorescent dye able to bind EPS.…”
Section: Effects Of Dgc Overexpression On Cell Surfaceassociated Strumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These particular pili are similar to curli structures described by Olsen et al (1989). The Curli (Pili or Microfi brillar) seem to be an envelope structure of major importance for surface colonization (Gualdi et al 2008), because provides stability to the biofi lm, allowing strong hydrodynamic conditions support on prolonged culture or without interruption (Donlan & Costerton 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…7 It has earlier been reported that curli fibers are a major factor in adhesion to surfaces and biofilm formation in many enterobacteria. 8 The increasing rate of the biofilm problem and its impact on antibiotic resistance triggered us to think a new means, which could disrupt the biofilm formation by inhibiting bacterial adhesion and curli formation. In view of the above-mentioned antibiotic resistance because of the bacterial biofilm, we introduced a nonantibiotic adjuvant EDTA along with b-lactam and b-lactamase inhibitor, which altogether termed as CSE1034, has the potential to break bacterial biofilms significantly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%