1984
DOI: 10.4319/lo.1984.29.5.1132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellulose digestion by freshwater microcrustacea1

Abstract: Representatives of three diverse families of Cladocera incorporated [14C(U)]cellulose with efficiencies of 2.3–11.5%, corrected for gut retention on the basis of chloroform‐ and methanol‐soluble label in tissue homogenates. This finding supports recent speculation that some detrital carbon may be used by consumers or affiliated symbionts without exogenous microbial transformation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a possible additional route of carbon flow in detritusbased ecosystems, as assimilation of pure cellulose or unconditioned detritus by animals has been demonstrated (Barlocher and Kendrick 1975, Foulds and Mann 1978, Schoenberg et al 1984, Sinsabaugh et al 1985. In nominal model simulations, it is assumed that detritivore and meiofauna biomass can assimilate polysaccharides directly at gross efficiencies of 14% (Cammen 1980, Sinsabaugh et al 1985) and 7% (Schoenberg et al 1984), respectively. There is currently no unequivocal evidence that ingested lignin can be directly assimilated by animals in aquatic environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a possible additional route of carbon flow in detritusbased ecosystems, as assimilation of pure cellulose or unconditioned detritus by animals has been demonstrated (Barlocher and Kendrick 1975, Foulds and Mann 1978, Schoenberg et al 1984, Sinsabaugh et al 1985. In nominal model simulations, it is assumed that detritivore and meiofauna biomass can assimilate polysaccharides directly at gross efficiencies of 14% (Cammen 1980, Sinsabaugh et al 1985) and 7% (Schoenberg et al 1984), respectively. There is currently no unequivocal evidence that ingested lignin can be directly assimilated by animals in aquatic environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can provide additional nutrients by fermenting carbohydrates and by synthesizing amino acids and essential vitamins. Daphnids are able to derive structural body components and lipids from the cellulose of algal cell walls [817], though it is widely accepted that daphnids, like almost all other animals, are unable to produce cellulase. Endogenous cellulase production is only known to occur in some snails, wood-boring beetles, shipworms and thysanurans [569].…”
Section: Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leaf-cutting ant Atta specifically cultures fungi, probably to obtain cellulase [594]. Bacteria have been found in the guts of an increasing number of crustaceans [653], but not yet in daphnids [817]. In view of the short gut residence times for daphnids, it is improbable that the growth of the daphnid's gut flora plays an important role.…”
Section: Digestionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that discrete primary organic carbon sources having different δ 13 C values exist in the lake. POM and SOM have usually been considered as the main food sources for zooplankton (Minshall 1967;Schoenberg et al 1984). However, the δ values of primary consumers in Lake Shirakoma-ike (D. longispina and A. pacificus) could not be explained by those of bulk POM and SOM.…”
Section: Implication Of the Difference In δ Values Between D Longispmentioning
confidence: 95%