2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2007.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellulase Supplementation Does Not Improve the Digestibility of a High-Forage Diet in Horses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be partly due to the greater nutrients digestibility with enzyme supplementation, which is consistent with previous results [9]. However, O'Connor-Robison et al [6] did not find a feed intake effect with cellulase in horse diets. To our knowledge, there are no in vivo studies available on cecal fermentation in horses.…”
Section: Feed Intake and Nutrient Digestibilitysupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This may be partly due to the greater nutrients digestibility with enzyme supplementation, which is consistent with previous results [9]. However, O'Connor-Robison et al [6] did not find a feed intake effect with cellulase in horse diets. To our knowledge, there are no in vivo studies available on cecal fermentation in horses.…”
Section: Feed Intake and Nutrient Digestibilitysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In contrast, Murray et al [9] reported a significant reduction in in vivo digestibility of the fibrous fractions of enzyme-treated high-temperature dried lucerne and ensiled lucerne. Similarly, O'Connor-Robison et al [6] fed Arabian geldings a hay-based diet supplemented with cellulase and noted that cellulase addition decreased digestion of the fiber components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cellulases belong to a large family of glycoside hydrolases and are common to a variety of bacteria, fungi, plants, and animals. Cellulases and related enzymes are widely used today in agriculture and research [Graminha et al, 2008;Lee et al, 2008;O'Connor-Robison et al, 2007;Zhao et al, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%