Textbook of Contact Dermatitis 1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-13119-0_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular Mechanisms in Allergic Contact Dermatitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study of 15-DAP, animals sensitized to this peroxide also reacted to 15-HPA (10). 15-HPDA cannot react via an epoxide, and animals sensitized to 15-HPDA did not cross-react significantly with /3-epoxyabietate. The cross-reactivity pattern between 15-HPA and the epoxides can be explained by another mechanistic route.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In a previous study of 15-DAP, animals sensitized to this peroxide also reacted to 15-HPA (10). 15-HPDA cannot react via an epoxide, and animals sensitized to 15-HPDA did not cross-react significantly with /3-epoxyabietate. The cross-reactivity pattern between 15-HPA and the epoxides can be explained by another mechanistic route.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…However, the two keto compounds that would form from 15-HPA and 15-HPDA would react with electron-rich sites in protein (NHZ and SH groups), generating two different antigens not likely to cross-react. 15-HPA would yield an ,ß-yfidiunsaturated ketone with which skin protein would react in a nucleophilic addition at C7, whereas 15-HPDA would yield a methyl phenyl type ketone on which a nucleophilic attack from protein would occur on the carbonyl group (31). The two antigens formed would have large structural differences and are not likely to cross-react since crossreactivity requires structural resemblance (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations