2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cellular Automata and Finite Volume solvers converge for 2D shallow flow modelling for hydrological modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This simplification is traditionally accepted based on the assumption that flooding over plain areas is characterized by slow velocity propagation. Thanks to the simplification of the governing equations, both the KWA and the DWA could reduce the computational times, although some authors have pointed out that the zero inertia approach could be computationally even more expensive than complete dynamic solvers due to a highly constraining stability requirement [5,12,13,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Unfortunately, in areas characterized by the presence of roads, railways or channel embankments, or in urban environments, where the flooding dynamics can be strongly influenced by streets and buildings and the main flow variables change rapidly in space and time, the flood inundation simulations performed with simplified models can give rise to unacceptable approximations [13,36,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This simplification is traditionally accepted based on the assumption that flooding over plain areas is characterized by slow velocity propagation. Thanks to the simplification of the governing equations, both the KWA and the DWA could reduce the computational times, although some authors have pointed out that the zero inertia approach could be computationally even more expensive than complete dynamic solvers due to a highly constraining stability requirement [5,12,13,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Unfortunately, in areas characterized by the presence of roads, railways or channel embankments, or in urban environments, where the flooding dynamics can be strongly influenced by streets and buildings and the main flow variables change rapidly in space and time, the flood inundation simulations performed with simplified models can give rise to unacceptable approximations [13,36,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, a model based on the complete version of the SWEs can be adopted in any situation and with a high degree of detail (provided that the domain geometry is sufficiently well known) [38]. As many authors state, in fact, strongly hyperbolic flows, such as those characterized by moving shock waves, cannot be accurately solved by applying the zero inertia approach [13,29,30,34,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The popular, alternative strategy of cellular automata modelling involves describing the physics governing fluid flow or sediment transport by means of discrete rules that control water, air and sediment transport processes on the basis of information from surrounding model grid cells (Willgoose et al 1991;Liu and Coulthard 2017). This cellular automata strategies have made it possible to reproduce shallow-water flows for hydrological purposes (Adams et al 2017;Caviedes-Voullième et al 2018), but also to simulate the development of braided streams (Murray and Paola 2003), floodplains (Coulthard and Van De Wiel 2006), sand dunes (Zhang et al 2012), wetland landscape pattern (Williams et al 2016) and river deltas , for evaluating their response to global changes and human drivers. Aside from cellular automata, precipiton methods can be applied for simulating the evolution of a river landscape, given their ability in mimicking self-organized emerging properties of geomorphological systems, from high-resolution braided patterns to drainage network organization (Davy et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When Ulam and von Neumann introduced cellular automata (CAs), they were motivated by biological applications and wanted to create a self-replicating machine, which could be analogous to the human brain and be computationally universal [1,2]. Later, CAs became of interest as models of complex phenomena in various fields of research, such as biology [3], environmental sciences [4], materials science [5], pedestrian dynamics [6], urban transport [7], hydrology [8], and agriculture [9], to name a few. This popularity is due to the fact that CAs reflect the assumption that all laws (physical, economic, sociological, and so on) must result from interactions that are strictly local.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%