2018
DOI: 10.1101/419481
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell-Type Switches Induced by Stochastic Histone Modification Inheritance

Abstract: Cell plasticity is important for tissue developments during which somatic cells may switch between distinct states. Genetic networks to yield multistable states are usually required to yield multiple states, and either external stimuli or noise in gene expressions are trigger signals to induce cell-type switches between the states. In many biological systems, cells show highly plasticity and can switch between different state spontaneously, but maintaining the dynamic equilibrium of the cell population. Here, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the Foxp3 promoter is not epigenetically repressed in Th17 cells, possibly enabling Th17-Treg plasticity (Wei et al ., 2009). In our phenomenological model which does not explicitly capture the molecular details of epigenetic repression (Huang and Lei, 2019; Zhao et al ., 2021), a bivalent chromatin state can be conceptually mapped on to the regions of relatively weak epigenetic influence of one master regulator on others. Thus, the weaker the epigenetic influence of node A on node B (α AB ) relative to that of node B on node A (α BA ), the higher the expected plasticity of the phenotype driven by node A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the Foxp3 promoter is not epigenetically repressed in Th17 cells, possibly enabling Th17-Treg plasticity (Wei et al ., 2009). In our phenomenological model which does not explicitly capture the molecular details of epigenetic repression (Huang and Lei, 2019; Zhao et al ., 2021), a bivalent chromatin state can be conceptually mapped on to the regions of relatively weak epigenetic influence of one master regulator on others. Thus, the weaker the epigenetic influence of node A on node B (α AB ) relative to that of node B on node A (α BA ), the higher the expected plasticity of the phenotype driven by node A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present model, we do not take into account the transcription processes, which have been implicated in the formation of bivalent chromatin (Voigt et al, 2013). Recent theoretical analyses have shown that incorporating the feedback from transcriptional products into the histone modification regulation can induce intermediate states (Huang and Lei, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019). So, it will be interesting to investigate the effect of transcription processes on the formation of bivalent chromatin in a model coupling both transcription processes and histone modification regulation.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second issue refers to the ability for randomness to produce spontaneous transitions, causing a system to switch from one stable state to another. In fact, some models posit that this ability of stochastic systems is fundamental to cell plasticity [ 9 , 10 ] and, hence, it could be an important feature to consider for understanding cancer progression [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Differences Between Deterministic and Stochastic Modeling Apmentioning
confidence: 99%