2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2020.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Beyond Deterministic Models in Drug Discovery and Development

Abstract: The model-informed drug discovery and development paradigm is now well established among the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies. This success has been mainly due to the ability of pharmacometrics to bring together different modeling strategies, such as population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) and systems biology/pharmacology. However, there are promising quantitative approaches that are still seldom used by pharmacometricians and that deserve consideration. One such case is the stochas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SDEME models are extensions of the frequently used nonlinear mixed effects models with differential equations, where the underlying dynamical system includes stochasticity (e.g., biological and environmental stochastic effects). Thus, SDEME models provide a means to distinguish the following three sources of variability: interindividual variability (IIV), stochasticity in the dynamics (also known as system noise), and measurement noise 16,20 . As this is—to the authors’ best knowledge—the first application of an SDEME model to analyze daily lung function measurements, the model structure was developed with the following criteria in mind: (1) the model should be conceptually simple with interpretable parameters, (2) it should be able to describe the most important stochastic characteristics and trends of the PEF data, and (3) it should be computationally feasible and robust enough to be applied to large sets of clinical trial data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDEME models are extensions of the frequently used nonlinear mixed effects models with differential equations, where the underlying dynamical system includes stochasticity (e.g., biological and environmental stochastic effects). Thus, SDEME models provide a means to distinguish the following three sources of variability: interindividual variability (IIV), stochasticity in the dynamics (also known as system noise), and measurement noise 16,20 . As this is—to the authors’ best knowledge—the first application of an SDEME model to analyze daily lung function measurements, the model structure was developed with the following criteria in mind: (1) the model should be conceptually simple with interpretable parameters, (2) it should be able to describe the most important stochastic characteristics and trends of the PEF data, and (3) it should be computationally feasible and robust enough to be applied to large sets of clinical trial data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are additional case studies of ML applications in pharmacometrics that do not yet create their own category [59][60][61], including the use of stochastic approaches to predict the effect of random genetic evolution or small populations [62,63]. However, stochastic approaches are more widely used for the generation of virtual patient populations.…”
Section: Stochasticity and Virtual Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling tumor resistance using evolutionary theories is helpful for predicting the resistance trajectories and exploring possibilities to overcome them [ 256 , 258 , 259 ]. Many modeling works characterized cancer genetic and clinical progression as a stochastic process [ 260 ], in which tumor cells proliferate, divide, and apoptosis based on probabilities [ 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 ]. Dynamic tumor evolution models were developed to predict the treatment responses of therapeutic antibodies [ 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 , 270 , 271 , 272 , 273 , 274 ].…”
Section: Modeling Pharmacodynamics Of Therapeutic Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%