2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell proliferation and modulation of interaction of estrogen receptors with coregulators induced by ERα and ERβ agonists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Luciferase activity was induced by E2 in a concentration-dependent manner in SKBR3 cells cotransfected with the ER-responsive luciferase reporter plasmid and either ERa or ERb expression vectors ( Figure 1A) with half-maximal induction of 8.5 AE 2.2 pM and 75 AE 29 pM E2, respectively ( Figure 1A; Table 1). These EC50 values are comparable to previously published results in human osteosarcoma cells transfected with ERa or ERb [30]. Concentration-dependent analysis showed that the ERb-selective ligands genistein or Br-ERb-041 were more potent activators of ERb-dependent luciferase reporter gene expression than that observed with ERa ( Figures 1B and C), with EC50 induction values in ERb-and ERa-transfected SKBR3 cells for genistein of 44 AE 19 nM and 260 AE 79 nM, and for Br-ERb-041 54 AE 8.5 nM and 970 AE 130 nM, respectively (Table 1).…”
Section: Subtype Selectivity Of Ligandssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Luciferase activity was induced by E2 in a concentration-dependent manner in SKBR3 cells cotransfected with the ER-responsive luciferase reporter plasmid and either ERa or ERb expression vectors ( Figure 1A) with half-maximal induction of 8.5 AE 2.2 pM and 75 AE 29 pM E2, respectively ( Figure 1A; Table 1). These EC50 values are comparable to previously published results in human osteosarcoma cells transfected with ERa or ERb [30]. Concentration-dependent analysis showed that the ERb-selective ligands genistein or Br-ERb-041 were more potent activators of ERb-dependent luciferase reporter gene expression than that observed with ERa ( Figures 1B and C), with EC50 induction values in ERb-and ERa-transfected SKBR3 cells for genistein of 44 AE 19 nM and 260 AE 79 nM, and for Br-ERb-041 54 AE 8.5 nM and 970 AE 130 nM, respectively (Table 1).…”
Section: Subtype Selectivity Of Ligandssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our present results indicate that E 2 , by activating the intracellular ERα, shortens the time spent by macrophages in the inflammatory status and facilitates the onset of the AD phenotype. Our findings are in line with and provide mechanistic insights to the reports of an estrogen positive effect on angiogenesis and proliferation 41 42 43 or in wound healing of chronic wounds 44 45 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As a result, a certain phytoestrogen may have different effects in, for example, the uterus, in which ERα is the major isoform (Pearce and Jordan, ), than in the prostate, in which ERβ is dominant (Enmark et al , ; Pearce and Jordan, ). These tissue‐specific effects may also result from differences in coactivators and corepressors activated upon activation of the two ERs in different tissues and/or the possible crosstalk of the ERs with other nuclear receptors (Wilson et al , ; Chang et al , ; Vanden Berghe and Haegeman, ; Evers et al , ; Evers et al , ). Furthermore, the actual mode of action of a phytoestrogen, either as an agonist or an antagonist, may also depend on the level of endogenous estrogens present (Barnes et al , ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%