1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01214826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell inactivation by heavy charged particles

Abstract: The inactivation of cells resulting in lethal or aberrant effects by charged particles is of growing interest. Charged particles at extremely high LET are capable of completely eliminating cell-type and cell-line differences in repair capacity. It is still not clear however whether the repair systems are inactivated, or merely that heavy-ion lesions are less repairable. Studies correlating the particle inactivation dose of radioresistant cells with intact DNA analyzed with pulse field gel electrophoresis and o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross-section and RBE for cell inactivation are comparable to those published elsewhere for mammalian cells exposed to Ar particles at comparable LETs (Wulf et al 1985;Blakely 1992;Courdi et al 1993). The crosssection for MN induction was almost half that for cell inactivation, respectively, 1/6 and 1/3 of the nuclear area of CAL4, suggesting that some particle traversals through the cell nucleus may not be sufficient for MN induction or cell killing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The cross-section and RBE for cell inactivation are comparable to those published elsewhere for mammalian cells exposed to Ar particles at comparable LETs (Wulf et al 1985;Blakely 1992;Courdi et al 1993). The crosssection for MN induction was almost half that for cell inactivation, respectively, 1/6 and 1/3 of the nuclear area of CAL4, suggesting that some particle traversals through the cell nucleus may not be sufficient for MN induction or cell killing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…3) or u ratios (Fig. 4) are used, these findings as well as other observations on non-neoplastic cells exposed to high LET radiation (33,34) indicate that radiosensitive cells have lower RBE than radioresistant cells. To the extent that in vitro survival data reflect the in vivo radiation response (35,36), these findings comfort the clinical impression that a gain factor is likely to be achieved for resistant tumours following high LET radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…A carbon ion beam is one of the high-linear energy transfer (LET) beams similar to neutron beams and α beams, and it has higher biological effectiveness and higher relative biological effectiveness than low LET beams such as X-rays or proton beams. The high-LET beam is biologically characterized by low recovery from sublethal damage [10], low differences in sensitivity caused by the cell cycle [11], low differences in sensitivity caused by the oxygen enhancement ratio [12], etc. The biological effectiveness of the carbon ion beam is similar in normal tissues, wherein there is an upsurge of the relative dose, called a Bragg peak, at about 15 cm from the body surface; however, the relative dose is significantly lower in shallow regions.…”
Section: Carbon Ion Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%