2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2012.00856.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell Damage Following Carbon Monoxide Releasing Molecule Exposure: Implications for Therapeutic Applications

Abstract: The cytoprotective properties of carbon monoxide (CO) gas and CO-releasing molecules (CORMs) are well established. Despite promising pre-clinical results, little attention has been paid to the toxicological profile of CORMs. The effects of CORM-2 and its CO-depleted molecule (iCORM-2) (20-400 lM) were compared in primary rat cardiomyocytes and two cell lines [human embryonic kidney (HeK) and Madine-Darby canine kidney Cells (MDCK)]. Cells were assessed for cell viability, apoptosis, necro-sis, cytology, mitoch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Active or inactive CO-RMs, at the concentrations used in our present studies, have previously been shown not to be toxic to mammalian cells in vitro and to rats in vivo (7,41). However, Winburn et al reported in vitro cytotoxic effects associated with ruthenium-based CO-RM byproducts, but not with CO, and suggested that accumulation of ruthenium in vivo might limit clinical application of these compounds (42). With these concerns in mind, we tested whether CORM-2-activated cells have the ability to transfer protection and treat experimental AP.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 42%
“…Active or inactive CO-RMs, at the concentrations used in our present studies, have previously been shown not to be toxic to mammalian cells in vitro and to rats in vivo (7,41). However, Winburn et al reported in vitro cytotoxic effects associated with ruthenium-based CO-RM byproducts, but not with CO, and suggested that accumulation of ruthenium in vivo might limit clinical application of these compounds (42). With these concerns in mind, we tested whether CORM-2-activated cells have the ability to transfer protection and treat experimental AP.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 42%
“…15 However, CORM-2 has been shown to be highly unstable in plasma. Together with its observed antiproliferative capacity, 19,20 this supports the advantage of targeted delivery of CORM-2 to cancer cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Efforts to evaluate the toxicity of common CORMs show mixed results. For example, ruthenium based CO donor CORM-2 was toxic to multiple cell lines (HeK 293 and MDCK) at 100 ÎŒM, as was its byproduct after CO release [88]. CORM-3 has shown similar toxicity to RAW 264.7 macrophages, but it is not toxic to human gingival fibroblasts, even at concentrations as high as 500 ÎŒM [89,90].…”
Section: Small Moleculesmentioning
confidence: 97%