2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11103-006-0014-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell Cycle Regulated D3-type Cyclins form Active Complexes with Plant-specific B-type Cyclin-dependent Kinase in vitro

Abstract: Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) cv Bright Yellow-2 (BY-2) cells are the most highly synchronizable plant cell culture, and previously we used them to analyze cell cycle regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) containing the cyclin binding motifs PSTAIRE (CDKA) and PPTA/TLRE (CDKB). Here we describe the analysis of tobacco CycD3 cyclins whose transcripts predominantly accumulate during G2 to M phase, which represents a unique feature of this type of cyclin D in plants. Although protein levels of CycD3s flu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, CYCD3 could also act as a mitotic cyclin, boosting G 2 /M kinase activity and hence directly enhancing progress from G 2 into mitosis. Although no association between CYCD and mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase has been detected in plant cell extracts using immunoprecipitation or proteomic approaches (32,33), cyclin-dependent kinase can bind Arabidopsis CYCD4;1 and tobacco CYCD3 in vitro (34,35), and histone H1-directed CYCD3 kinase activity is detected in mitotic tobacco suspension cultured BY-2 cells (36). The evidence for CYCD promotion of the G 2 /M transition is equivocal: Antirrhinum CYCD1, when induced at G 2 /M in synchronized BY-2 cells, indeed increased the rate of progression through mitosis (37), and ectopic expression of CYCD3;1 in Arabidopsis trichomes leads to additional mitoses (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, CYCD3 could also act as a mitotic cyclin, boosting G 2 /M kinase activity and hence directly enhancing progress from G 2 into mitosis. Although no association between CYCD and mitotic cyclin-dependent kinase has been detected in plant cell extracts using immunoprecipitation or proteomic approaches (32,33), cyclin-dependent kinase can bind Arabidopsis CYCD4;1 and tobacco CYCD3 in vitro (34,35), and histone H1-directed CYCD3 kinase activity is detected in mitotic tobacco suspension cultured BY-2 cells (36). The evidence for CYCD promotion of the G 2 /M transition is equivocal: Antirrhinum CYCD1, when induced at G 2 /M in synchronized BY-2 cells, indeed increased the rate of progression through mitosis (37), and ectopic expression of CYCD3;1 in Arabidopsis trichomes leads to additional mitoses (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phosphorylation of Rb by CDKA-CycD activates the transcription of E2F-regulated genes and S-phase progression [21]. Also, a tobacco CDKB-CycD complex capable of phosphorylating histone H1 and an Rb-related protein was reported recently [22].The sequential expression of the CycD-family, from early G1 to the onset of S-phase [23], is thought to drive the cell through G1 and the G1/S boundary. CycD function in plants may be analogous to the co-operative function of mammalian CycD and CycE, which retain Rb protein in an inactive state up to S-phase initiation (Fig.…”
Section: Cell Cycle Regulation: Cdc2/cdc28/cdk1/a As Checkpoint Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CDK2 seems to be recruited for H1 phosphorylation by Cdc45, a protein required for DNA replication, while chromatin relaxation occurs because the transfer of phosphate groups de-stabilizes the interactions between H1 and chromatin [95][96][97]. In plants, members of the CDKA and CDKB groups have been reported to phosphorylate H1 [17,18,22,[98][99][100][101][102] but their role in regulation of chromatin remodelling remains uncertain.…”
Section: Cdks and Transcriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to determine whether a similar binding happens in P. patens, we examined the interaction between CYCD;1 and CDKA by coimmunoprecipitation using epitope-tagged CYCD;1 ( Figure 5). As a negative control, we prepared a CYCD;1 mutant (CYCD;1KAEA) in which Ala replaced two amino acids (Lys-141 and Glu-171) previously identified in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) as being required for CYCD binding CDKA (Kawamura et al, 2006). Constructs containing the coding sequences driven by a heat shock-inducible promoter (HSP; Saidi et al, 2005) and followed by a triple hemagglutinin (HA)-tag were recombined into the PIG1 targeting region (Okano et al, 2009) to obtain the stable HSP:CYCD;1-3HA and HSP:CYCD;1KAEA-3HA transgenic lines (see Supplemental Figure 9 online).…”
Section: Cycd;1 Binds To Cdka In Leaf Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%