2016
DOI: 10.4185/rlcs-2016-1123en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Celebrities, gender-based violence and women’s rights: towards the transformation of the framework of recognition?

Abstract: How to cite this article in bibliographies / References MJ Gámez Fuentes, E Gómez Nicolau, R Maseda García (2016): "Celebrities, gender-based violence and women"s rights: towards the transformation of the framework of recognition?".

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given this context in which fat shaming has few negative consequences (Crandall, 1994), it is understandable that our participants echoed prominent social mores. Van Amsterdam (2013) identified this as a “big fat inequality” where discrimination based on body size parallels the biases found in racist, ableist, and misogynistic ideologies and practices; however, in our data we found that victim blaming—which is often done to women (Gámez Fuentes & Maseda García, 2018; Gómez Nicolau, 2018; Grubb & Turner, 2012)—was only exercised around sizeism. In this way, our findings align with prior research noting that victim blaming is differentiated by circumstance and correlated with discrimination (see Johnson et al., 2002).…”
Section: Discussion and Significancementioning
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given this context in which fat shaming has few negative consequences (Crandall, 1994), it is understandable that our participants echoed prominent social mores. Van Amsterdam (2013) identified this as a “big fat inequality” where discrimination based on body size parallels the biases found in racist, ableist, and misogynistic ideologies and practices; however, in our data we found that victim blaming—which is often done to women (Gámez Fuentes & Maseda García, 2018; Gómez Nicolau, 2018; Grubb & Turner, 2012)—was only exercised around sizeism. In this way, our findings align with prior research noting that victim blaming is differentiated by circumstance and correlated with discrimination (see Johnson et al., 2002).…”
Section: Discussion and Significancementioning
confidence: 48%
“…Scholars from several disciplines have argued that media depictions of violence perpetuate problematic notions, such as the vulnerability of women (Faulkner & MacDonald, 2009; Gámez Fuentes & Maseda García, 2018; Kaplan, 2005). While the literature problematizes media portrayals of direct violence in form of rapes, domestic abuse, and sexual aggressions, these analyses rarely link these acts of direct violence to the social structure or to the repetitive cultural representations that ultimately naturalize violence against women (Gámez Fuentes & Maseda García, 2018; Valencia & Herrera Sánchez, 2020). However, media can also make complex social phenomena visible, challenging dominant representations of gender violence and therein giving light to issues that do not get enough attention (Gill, 2007b; Kaplan, 2006; Maseda García et al., 2020).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Typologies Of Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will put it into dialogue with the work of Oliver (2001, 2004) and Kaplan (2005) on ethical witnessing to enquire into theoretical and methodological possibilities to approach the analysis and production of cultural products that attempt to break away from that polarization. To carry out this research, we have operationalized the concept of ethical witnessing into four dimensions of analysis so that we can detect what narrative strategies may constitute ethical witnessing (Gámez Fuentes et al, 2016; Gámez Fuentes and Maseda García, 2018; Maseda García and Gómez Nicolau, 2018). The four dimensions are (1) the relation between the subject victim and those who bear witness; (2) the very content of the testimony; (3) the approach on vulnerability, resistance and agency and (4) the links between the specific account of violence and the struggle for women’s rights and social justice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%