2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms—Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
36
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…; Hille et al . ), the study results suggest that herd‐ and sample‐level estimates of CTX‐M E. coli in beef cattle in GB were much lower. While the methodology of isolation of ESBL‐producing and AmpC phenotype E. coli in these two studies were not identical to those used in this study, they were similar in that they did involve a pre‐enrichment stage and then plating onto selective agar (MacConkey agar plates containing 1 mg l −1 cefotaxime).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Hille et al . ), the study results suggest that herd‐ and sample‐level estimates of CTX‐M E. coli in beef cattle in GB were much lower. While the methodology of isolation of ESBL‐producing and AmpC phenotype E. coli in these two studies were not identical to those used in this study, they were similar in that they did involve a pre‐enrichment stage and then plating onto selective agar (MacConkey agar plates containing 1 mg l −1 cefotaxime).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…; Hille et al . ). In the United Kingdom, the first case of CTX‐M ESBL‐producing E. coli was reported in calves in a dairy herd in 2004 (Teale et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…FU provided 50 CMY-2-producing E. coli isolates from chicken ( n = 9 in 2011 and n = 28 in 2012), turkey ( n = 1 in 2012 and n = 3 in 2014), pig ( n = 6 in 2011 and n = 2 in 2012) and cattle ( n = 1 in 2012) for WGS analysis. These isolates were collected in longitudinal- and cross-sectional studies in different livestock farms during the years 2011–2014 [ 66 70 ]; only isolates from unique production sites were included. In addition, BfR provided 63 CMY-2-producing E. coli isolates that were identified from 2500 food samples of different origins and matrices, collected and investigated by different German state laboratories, in the scope of a cross-sectional study on ESBL- E. coli in foodstuff in Germany (unpublished data).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Raten lagen bei den Mastitisproben deutlich höher als bei den Isolaten aus Tankmilchproben und denen von Mastrindern. In gezielten Untersuchungen wurde in den letzten Jahren wiederholt gezeigt, dass cephalosporinresistente E. coli häufig in deutschen Milch-und Mastrindbetrieben vorkommen [25] [26]. Aus Verbraucherschutzgesichtspunkten ist vorteilhaft, dass Mastitismilch nicht als Lebensmittel in den Verkehr gebracht werden darf und dass Milch, die als Lebensmittel in Verkehr gebracht wird, ganz überwiegend einer Wärmebehandlung unterliegt, wodurch etwaige mikrobielle Belastungen eliminiert werden.…”
Section: Entwicklung Der Resistenzraten Im Zeitverlaufunclassified