1982
DOI: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1982.tb03208.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ceforanide: Antibacterial Activity, Pharmacology, and Clinical Efficacy

Abstract: Ceforanide is a new cephalosporin with a longer elimination half-life than any currently available cephalosporin. Its activity is very similar to that of cefamandole, a second-generation cephalosporin, except that ceforanide is less active against most gram-positive organisms. Many coliforms, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Proteus, are susceptible to ceforanide, as are most strains of Salmonella, Shigella, Hemophilus, Citrobacter and Arizona species. However, most strains of Serratia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, using the CMAP database, we identified three small molecular compounds (CeForanide, Chenodeoxycholic acid, and 0317956-0000) that potentially interact with central genes. Reports from clinical trials show that ceforanide has a satisfactory antibacterial effect, and is effective in treating skin and soft tissue, pulmonary and urinary tract infections, bone and joint infections, and endocarditis [ 32 ]. The small molecule drugs that we screened may exert potential activity against atherosclerosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, using the CMAP database, we identified three small molecular compounds (CeForanide, Chenodeoxycholic acid, and 0317956-0000) that potentially interact with central genes. Reports from clinical trials show that ceforanide has a satisfactory antibacterial effect, and is effective in treating skin and soft tissue, pulmonary and urinary tract infections, bone and joint infections, and endocarditis [ 32 ]. The small molecule drugs that we screened may exert potential activity against atherosclerosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibacterial drugs: 1 Pechere & Dugal (1979); 2 Noone (1984); 3 Rlstuccia & Cunha (1985); 4 Meyer (1981); 5 Hallynek et al (1981); 6 Craig at al. (1983); 7 Guay (1983); 8 Brogden et al (1976); 9 Tartaglione & Polk (1985); 10 Balant et al (1985); 11 Thompson & Wright (1983); 12 Clark et al (1983); 13 Derry (1981); 14 Leroy et al (1982); 15 Czerwinski & Federson (1979);16 Qulntillanl & Nightingale (1978); 17 Gambertoglio et al (1984); 18 Pontzer & Kaye (1984); 19 Lyon (1983); 20 Barriere & Mills (1982); 21 Doluiso (1982); 22 Konishi & Ozawa (1984); 23 Kampf et al (1981); 24 Ohkawa et al (1981); 25 Matzke & Keane (1983); 26 Richards …”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It would be expected that the higher serum levels of each of these agents subsequent to intra venous rather than intramuscular admin istration would produce corresponding increases in these tissue levels [9,15]. In a study of intravenous administration of 2 g intravenous doses of cefazolin, uter ine tissue levels were maintained over 12.5 ¡xg/g for at least 150 min [9], Fur ther, if the cefazolin was administered in the operating room just prior to surgery, instead of on call to the operating room, then more optimal concentrations would presumably be present during the in traoperative period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%