2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2005.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD3-specific antibodies restore self-tolerance: mechanisms and clinical applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that depletion regimes that spare regulatory T cells or memory T cells may be particularly successful, because these cells could potentially curb excessive pathological responses of reduced numbers of effector T cells. A remarkably successful strategy that inhibits clinical manifestations of diabetes is the treatment using anti-CD3 Abs, which, similar to the data described here, induce only partial and transient lymphopenia that appears to spare CD25 ϩ CD4 ϩ regulatory T cells (68,69).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…It is possible that depletion regimes that spare regulatory T cells or memory T cells may be particularly successful, because these cells could potentially curb excessive pathological responses of reduced numbers of effector T cells. A remarkably successful strategy that inhibits clinical manifestations of diabetes is the treatment using anti-CD3 Abs, which, similar to the data described here, induce only partial and transient lymphopenia that appears to spare CD25 ϩ CD4 ϩ regulatory T cells (68,69).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Several mechanisms have been proposed for the action of anti-CD3 antibody. Inducing depletion of effector T cells, down regulation of TCR, and immune deviation of the pathogenic T cells toward Th2 cells reviewed in (22). The induction of regulatory T cells by anti-CD3 antibody has also been demonstrated in the animal model for diabetes, in which there was induction of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells that differ from the naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blockade of co-stimulatory signals through CD4 or CD40L induces peripheral tolerance [72]. CD4 + CD25 + T reg cells can be generated from CD4 + CD25 − T cells in vivo after treatment with non-mito-genic αCD3 F(ab') 2 fragments, suggesting that tolerance and the immune response to antigens are regulated by signal strength [47,49]. Similarly, another study by Ochi et al using oral therapy of αCD3, which induces LAP + [latency-associated peptide (positive)] CD4 + T cells, confirms that TGFβ1-dependent T reg -cell generation is important for preventing autoimmune disease [73].…”
Section: The Role Of Signal Strength In T-cell Activation and Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice, which develop spontaneous autoimmune type 1 diabetes, CD4 + CD25 hi T reg cells, but not CD4 + CD25 + cells, exhibit regulatory function and the absence of T reg -cell function in CD4 + CD25 + cells is owing to a lack of TGFβ1 production [2,49]. In these mice, the proportion of TGFβ1-producing T reg cells decreases with age and correlates with disease onset and progression [50].…”
Section: Tgfβ Function In T Reg Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%