1998
DOI: 10.1117/12.310789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD control comparison of step-and-repeat versus step-and-scan DUV lithography for sub-0.25-μm gate printing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, it was a locally pronounced case of coma [2]. Other authors found out that variations of reticle CD's cause heavy intrafield variations of final gate CD's [3]. In our case, the reticle CD's are well controlled.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In our case, it was a locally pronounced case of coma [2]. Other authors found out that variations of reticle CD's cause heavy intrafield variations of final gate CD's [3]. In our case, the reticle CD's are well controlled.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Additionally, each reticle has its own image size characteristic due to variations in the mask-making process [6,7]. Initially, dose settings were manually calculated by referring to a paper logbook of past settings and errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%