CCS from industrial sources

Fennell, Paul S.; Florin, Nick; Napp, Tamaryn; Hills, Thomas

doi:10.5339/stsp.2012.ccs.17

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 23 publications

(30 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, Sherwood estimates align with processes with relatively low energy penalty and should be considered a lower bound in instances that deviate from this system design . As an example, compare oxyfiring with calcium loopingshown to integrate well in cement facilitiesagainst PCC MEA capture. , …”

Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 87%

Carbon Capture and Utilization in the Industrial Sector

Psarras

Comello

Bains

et al. 2017

Environ. Sci. Technol.

104

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The fabrication and manufacturing processes of industrial commodities such as iron, glass, and cement are carbon-intensive, accounting for 23% of global CO emissions. As a climate mitigation strategy, CO capture from flue gases of industrial processes-much like that of the power sector-has not experienced wide adoption given its high associated costs. However, some industrial processes with relatively high CO flue concentration may be viable candidates to cost-competitively supply CO for utilization purposes (e.g., polymer manufacturing, etc.). This work develops a methodology that determines the levelized cost ($/tCO) of separating, compressing, and transporting carbon dioxide. A top-down model determines the cost of separating and compressing CO across 18 industrial processes. Further, the study calculates the cost of transporting CO via pipeline and tanker truck to appropriately paired sinks using a bottom-up cost model and geo-referencing approach. The results show that truck transportation is generally the low-cost alternative given the relatively small volumes (ca. 100 kt CO/a). We apply our methodology to a regional case study in Pennsylvania, which shows steel and cement manufacturing paired to suitable sinks as having the lowest levelized cost of capture, compression, and transportation.

show abstract

Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 87%

Carbon Capture and Utilization in the Industrial Sector

Psarras

Comello

Bains

et al. 2017

Environ. Sci. Technol.

104

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Zakkour and Cook [12] emphasized on the high purity sources (>80% CO 2 ), and briefly summarized the level of industrial activity in each sector. Fennel et al [13] have also presented a detailed list of industrial and power generation sectors, focusing on the CO 2 partial pressure and the cost thatis associated with its removal from the gas stream.…”

Section: Carbon Source Characterizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Holistic Assessment of Carbon Capture and Utilization Value Chains

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) is recognized by the European Union, along with carbon, capture and storage (CCS), as one of the main tools towards global warming mitigation. It has, thus, been extensively studied by various researchers around the world. The majority of the papers published so far focus on the individual stages of a CCU value chain (carbon capture, separation, purification, transportation, and transformation/utilization). However, a holistic approach, taking into account the matching and the interaction between these stages, is also necessary in order to optimize and develop technically and economically feasible CCU value chains. The objective of this contribution is to present the most important studies that are related to the individual stages of CCU and to perform a critical review of the major existing methods, algorithms and tools that focus on the simulation or optimization of CCU value chains. The key research gaps will be identified and examined in order to lay the foundation for the development of a methodology towards the holistic assessment of CCU value chains.

show abstract

“…Each process and site is unique and will likely require bespoke equipment and plant design. Current cost estimates are USD 15-138/tCO 2 for cement and USD 51-64/tCO 2 for steel (Fennell et al, 2012). Research priorities for industrial CCS include: (1) improving heat and flow integration; (2) testing the impact of impurities on the capture process; and (3) developing novel sorbents optimised for industrial operating conditions.…”

Section: Carbon Capture and Storage (Ccs)mentioning

confidence: 99%

G20 GHG emissions by sector (% of total GHG emissions excluding LULUCF)

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.

show abstract

CCS from industrial sources

Cited by 10 publications

References 23 publications

Carbon Capture and Utilization in the Industrial Sector

Carbon Capture and Utilization in the Industrial Sector

Holistic Assessment of Carbon Capture and Utilization Value Chains

G20 GHG emissions by sector (% of total GHG emissions excluding LULUCF)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About