1910
DOI: 10.1039/ct9109702477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CCLV.—The colour changes of methyl-orange and methyl-red in acid solution

Abstract: IT is well known t.hat the colour of an indicator in solution depends, within certain limits, on the concentration of the hydrogen ion (or hydroxyl ion) in the solution. These limits, which vary greatly with the nature of the indicator? have been determined for a large number of indicators by Fels (Zeitsch. Elektrochem., 1904, 10, 208) and Salessky (ibid., p. 205), and a knowledge of them enables us t o choose, for any given volumetric operation, the indicator that will give the best results. Conversely, by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1921
1921
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the mass action equation requires that, if one is able to determine both limits, equally distant from the half-transfor-mation point (at pair 4), then pairs 3, 4, and 5 will be substantially correct as calculated by the plan in question, but pairs 2 and 6 will be in error by nearly 0.10 pH, and pairs 1 and 7 by about 0.25. The mass action equation is, however, in accord over the useful interval of pH with the measurements of Tizard (1910) for methyl red, of Barnett and Chapman (1918) for phenol red,2 and of the present writer for all indicators studied by Medalia, except the acid range of thymol blue, which was not studied.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…In fact, the mass action equation requires that, if one is able to determine both limits, equally distant from the half-transfor-mation point (at pair 4), then pairs 3, 4, and 5 will be substantially correct as calculated by the plan in question, but pairs 2 and 6 will be in error by nearly 0.10 pH, and pairs 1 and 7 by about 0.25. The mass action equation is, however, in accord over the useful interval of pH with the measurements of Tizard (1910) for methyl red, of Barnett and Chapman (1918) for phenol red,2 and of the present writer for all indicators studied by Medalia, except the acid range of thymol blue, which was not studied.…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…The images in Figure S4 (Supporting Information) yield insight into near surface charging effects that may account for the electrostatic desorption process. Methyl orange is a pH indicator that gradually turns from yellow to red as the pH is decreased below 4.5 . Upon application of 3 V to an adsorbed MO monolayer, the effluent solution in Figure S4 (Supporting Information) takes on a pink to red color, indicating a decrease in pH below 4.5 and thus significant production of protons at the MWNT anode surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%