2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20020454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cavity Ring-Down Methane Sensor for Small Unmanned Aerial Systems

Abstract: We present the development, integration, and testing of an open-path cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) methane sensor for deployment on small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS). The open-path configuration used here (without pump or flow-cell) enables a low mass (4 kg) and low power (12 W) instrument that can be readily integrated to sUAS, defined here as having all-up mass of <25 kg. The instrument uses a compact telecom style laser at 1651 nm (near-infrared) and a linear 2-mirror high-finesse cavity. We sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They can fly near the source and can be directed automatically using waypoints to enable even and unbiased spatial sampling (Greatwood et al, 2017;Feitz et al, 2018). There are three principal approaches for measuring methane mole fraction from a UAV in situ: on-board air samples can be collected for subsequent analysis (Chang et al, 2016;Greatwood et al, 2017;Andersen et al, 2018), air can be pumped through a long tube to a sensor on the ground for analysis (Brosy et al, 2017;Wolf et al, 2017;Shah et al, 2019) or air can be analysed live using a sensor mounted on board the UAV (Berman et al, 2012;Khan et al, 2012;Nathan et al, 2015;Golston et al, 2017;Martinez et al, 2020). Yet, a key limitation to accurate source identification and flux quantification is the precision and accuracy of methane mole fraction measurements (Hodgkinson and Tatam, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They can fly near the source and can be directed automatically using waypoints to enable even and unbiased spatial sampling (Greatwood et al, 2017;Feitz et al, 2018). There are three principal approaches for measuring methane mole fraction from a UAV in situ: on-board air samples can be collected for subsequent analysis (Chang et al, 2016;Greatwood et al, 2017;Andersen et al, 2018), air can be pumped through a long tube to a sensor on the ground for analysis (Brosy et al, 2017;Wolf et al, 2017;Shah et al, 2019) or air can be analysed live using a sensor mounted on board the UAV (Berman et al, 2012;Khan et al, 2012;Nathan et al, 2015;Golston et al, 2017;Martinez et al, 2020). Yet, a key limitation to accurate source identification and flux quantification is the precision and accuracy of methane mole fraction measurements (Hodgkinson and Tatam, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have used UAV remote-sensing measurements to derive emission fluxes (Golston et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2018). However, to our knowledge, only Nathan et al (2015) have derived fugitive methane emission fluxes using UAV in situ measurements. In that study, a UAV with an on-board in situ low-precision sensor (±0.1 ppm at 1 Hz) flew in orbits around a gas compressor station, using mass balance box modelling, with geospatial kriging for interpolation, to derive the emission flux.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, we used a large industrial drone (Matrice 600 Pro; SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China) as a platform to measure atmospheric phenomena using the mounted MSS. Because of its advanced functionality, versatility, and scalability, this drone model has been applied in numerous studies and research projects [ 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 ] in various application fields. According to the official specifications provided by the manufacturer, the total weight and the maximum payload are, respectively, 10 kg and 6.0 kg.…”
Section: Proposed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such transient events can lead to significant fugitive CH 4 emissions, some of which are addressed under current U.S. landfill regulations which require a quarterly gridded "walkover" survey using a portable CH 4 analyzer, followed by timely remediation. Given rapidly evolving sensor (Martinez et al, 2020) and drone technology (Daug_ ela et al, 2020;Kim et al, 2021), it is likely that the surface detection methods can be significantly expanded, especially from localized areas that may not be currently included (i.e., steep slopes). Finally, of particular importance at U.S. landfills is the relatively common practice of removing an existing intermediate cover prior to vertical expansions for new cell development-this exposes fully methanogenic older waste resulting in very high CH 4 emissions per unit area from a small footprint (Cambaliza et al, 2017; Figure S4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%